Home » Entertainment » Building a State of Fear in “Extremist” Groups

Building a State of Fear in “Extremist” Groups

“`html

Sasha Skochilenko:‍ Art, Protest, and ⁢a Seven-Year‍ Sentence in Putin’s Russia

The case of ⁣artist Sasha Skochilenko highlights ‌the escalating repression of dissent ⁤in Russia following the ‍invasion of Ukraine, transforming a​ simple act of protest into a symbol ​of resistance and ‌state control.

The Protest and​ the Arrest

On March 11, 2022, just weeks after ​Russia’s full-scale invasion‌ of Ukraine, Sasha⁤ Skochilenko, a 33-year-old artist, poet, and musician, engaged in⁢ a quiet act of defiance. ⁣ She replaced price tags in a​ Perekrestok supermarket ​in St. Petersburg with anti-war‍ messages. These ⁣weren’t grand pronouncements,but stark statements of fact: “The Russian Army‌ bombed an art school in Mariupol where about 400 people were seeking shelter,” and “Putin has ⁢been lying to you from the television screen for 20 ⁣years. The result of these lies is our willingness⁢ to accept war and senseless deaths.”

The act, ⁣a ⁣form ⁤of guerrilla performance art, was reported to police by galina ⁣Baranova, a 76-year-old shopper. Baranova, in an interview with Fontanka.ru, stated ‍she felt compelled to act ​due to the messages’ perceived negativity ‍and ‌potential to⁣ disrupt public order.‍ This seemingly minor incident quickly escalated into ⁣a criminal case.

Sasha Skochilenko in⁣ court, November 2023. (Source: Mediazona)
Sasha Skochilenko ​in court

The Charge: ‍Discrediting the Russian Armed forces

Skochilenko was initially charged ​with “discrediting⁤ the Russian Armed forces” under Article ‌20.3.3 of the Administrative Code, a law passed shortly⁢ after the invasion specifically targeting criticism of the military. ⁤ However, the charges were⁢ later upgraded to a ⁤more serious offense under Article ​280.3 of the Criminal⁣ Code – disseminating knowingly false information about the actions of ⁣the Russian​ Armed Forces. This​ shift⁢ meant potential imprisonment rather than a fine.

The prosecution argued that Skochilenko’s actions‍ were premeditated ​and intended to incite public unrest. They presented ‌Baranova’s testimony as key evidence, ‍framing Skochilenko’s protest as a purposeful attempt to⁣ spread misinformation and undermine support for the war. ⁤Skochilenko maintained ‌her ‌innocence, arguing that she was simply expressing her opposition ⁤to the conflict and sharing​ information already available ⁣in the public⁢ domain.

The⁤ Trial ‍and the verdict

The trial, held ‌in St.⁣ Petersburg, was widely criticized by human rights⁣ organizations and international​ observers as politically motivated. Skochilenko⁢ was held in pre-trial detention for over a year,a‌ period her supporters‍ say was deliberately harsh⁤ to pressure her into a confession. During the trial, Skochilenko repeatedly emphasized the peaceful ‍nature of her protest and her commitment to⁤ truth.

On ⁣November 16, 2023, the court delivered its verdict: seven years​ in a penal colony. The sentence was

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.