Crypto Tycoon Justin Sun Sues Actress Jing Tian Over Surrogacy Dispute and Millions in Lost Funds
- Sun filed a civil lawsuit against Jing and her parents to recover more than 30 million Chinese yuan, while also seeking property preservation through legal channels.
- According to coverage by Mirror Daily, the legal action follows a dispute involving an overseas surrogacy agreement bearing a signature that resembles Jing Tian's public signature.
- Jing Tian's studio issued a formal public statement rejecting the allegations and characterizing the claims as an attempt to leverage an artist's reputation.
Sun filed a civil lawsuit against Jing and her parents to recover more than 30 million Chinese yuan, while also seeking property preservation through legal channels.
Lawsuit Filed Over Financial and Surrogacy Disputes
According to coverage by Mirror Daily, the legal action follows a dispute involving an overseas surrogacy agreement bearing a signature that resembles Jing Tian’s public signature. Reports indicate that an initial payment of 100,000 US dollars was made, alongside a transfer of 30 million Chinese yuan to the actress. Sources cited by Mirror Daily claim that private arrangements in Los Angeles included a private jet and a hotel floor reserved for the actress during the planned procedure. Sun subsequently published a detailed account of their relationship history and financial requests on social media, detailing credit card usage and property inquiries, though he concluded the post by stating it was fictional, as noted by Mirror Daily.
Studio Response and Legal Proceedings
Jing Tian’s studio issued a formal public statement rejecting the allegations and characterizing the claims as an attempt to leverage an artist’s reputation. According to the studio’s statement published across multiple entertainment outlets, the team intends to rely entirely on legal procedures rather than engaging further in public discussions.
Reputation is an artist’s life and also an artist’s vulnerability, but we have the courage to say no to extortion behavior that uses an artist’s reputation as leverage,
the studio stated, as reported by Mirror Daily and Line Today. Both parties are now navigating the dispute through formal legal channels.

