Manuel ⁢Monsalve’s ​Defense Complicated⁤ by New Evidence

The victim of Manuel Monsalve, ‌the former Under Secretary of the Interior, has revealed that she had two meetings with him after the alleged rape ⁤and sexual abuse on September 22. During⁢ one of these meetings, she confirmed that she had not given her consent to have sexual relations.

According to reports, Monsalve’s version of events has⁢ been contradicted by the victim’s testimony,⁢ which states ⁣that she‌ did not consent to sexual relations. This new information ⁣has complicated Monsalve’s defense and raised questions ​about his actions following the alleged ‍incident.

Monsalve’s Meetings with the Victim

The victim has revealed that she had two meetings with Monsalve ⁤after the alleged incident. During the ‌first meeting, ‌she told him that she had ⁤not consented to sexual relations. Monsalve then took ⁤a leave​ of ​absence and did not return⁣ to work.

Monsalve’s Request for⁣ PDI Tasks

About a week later, Monsalve‍ asked the head ⁤of intelligence of the PDI, Cristina Vilches, to coordinate the review of security cameras and visit the victim’s home.⁤ This ​request has raised questions about Monsalve’s motives⁢ and⁤ whether he was ​trying to intimidate the victim or gather evidence to support his defense.

Testimony from the Victim’s Colleague

The victim’s ⁢colleague, Ricardo Lillo,‍ has corroborated the victim’s ⁢testimony in a statement to the⁣ PDI. Lillo confirmed that the victim had confided in him about the alleged incident and that⁣ she had told ⁣him about the two meetings⁢ with Monsalve.

Implications for Monsalve’s Defense

The ​new evidence has undermined Monsalve’s defense‌ and raised ‍questions about his actions following the alleged ‌incident. The fact that ⁤he requested PDI tasks after the​ victim had ⁢already told ​him that she had⁢ not consented to sexual relations has raised suspicions ⁣about his motives ‌and whether he was trying to intimidate the victim or gather evidence to‍ support his defense.