Home » World » Elon Musk dice que la SEC le ordena pagar una multa por la compra de Twitter o enfrentará cargos

Elon Musk dice que la SEC le ordena pagar una multa por la compra de Twitter o enfrentará cargos

by Catherine Williams - Chief Editor

Musk Clashes with SEC Over Twitter Stock Purchase

New ​York – Elon musk is facing a new battle with the Securities adn Exchange Commission (SEC) over his initial purchase of Twitter stock in 2022.

The Tesla CEO took to his social media platform, X,⁢ to reveal that the SEC is demanding he pay ​an undisclosed fine to settle charges related to his early stock acquisitions. musk shared a letter from his lawyer, Alex Spiro, addressed to ⁤outgoing SEC Chair Gary ‍Gensler, which stated the agency was giving Musk a 48-hour ultimatum to accept‌ the fine for alleged failure to disclose his Twitter stock purchases⁤ or face “multiple criminal charges.”

Musk responded to the news with a sarcastic jab at Gensler, posting, “Oh Gary, how⁢ could you do this to me?”

The ⁤SEC declined to comment on the ‍matter, citing its policy‍ of not discussing ongoing investigations.

This latest⁢ development adds another⁤ layer‌ to ⁤the already complex ​relationship ⁤between Musk ⁢and the SEC. In 2018, Musk​ reached a settlement with the agency over tweets he‍ made about taking Tesla private, agreeing to pay ⁤a $20 million fine and‌ step down as Tesla’s chairman.

Musk Accuses SEC of ‘Improper Campaign’ in Leaked Letter

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has accused the⁤ securities and Exchange ​commission (SEC) of‌ waging ‍a “campaign with improper motives” against him in a bombshell ⁢letter leaked to the public. The ⁢letter, penned by Musk’s attorney ⁢Alex⁣ Spiro, alleges that the SEC ​is pursuing baseless charges against Musk and his ​companies, including Neuralink,‍ in an attempt to silence him.

The letter claims that​ SEC staff indicated⁣ that​ charges against Musk were ⁢imminent unless he agreed to certain demands. Spiro vehemently denies these allegations, stating that Musk refuses to succumb to the⁢ SEC’s pressure.”This series of events makes it clear that the commission is not seeking the truth, but is engaged in a campaign with improper motives against Mr. Musk and the people ‍and companies associated ⁣with ⁢him,” Spiro wrote.”We demand to know who directed these actions, whether ​it was you or the White ‍House. These tactics and improper schemes will‌ not intimidate us.”

The ‍letter also alleges that Spiro himself was subpoenaed ⁤to testify but refused to cooperate.

This⁤ latest clash between Musk ⁢and the SEC follows years of tension. The relationship soured further under SEC Chair Gary Gensler, a vocal critic of cryptocurrencies, an area where Musk ⁢is a prominent investor ⁢and advocate.

The SEC previously reached a settlement with Musk and Tesla in​ 2018 after finding that musk had misled investors with a tweet claiming he had “secured funding” to take ⁢Tesla private. ‌Under the agreement, both Musk and Tesla paid ‍$20 million fines, and⁢ Musk agreed to ⁤have his tweets about the company pre-approved by other Tesla executives. He stepped ⁤down as chairman of‍ tesla but retained his position as CEO.

Musk has since criticized the SEC, calling the agency a “bastard” and accusing it of harassment. This latest letter suggests the feud is far from over.

Musk and Gensler: A Regulatory ⁢Tug-of-War Ends

Elon Musk’s tumultuous relationship with SEC Chair gary Gensler is coming ⁢to an end, potentially paving the way ​for a more favorable regulatory landscape for the tech ⁣billionaire.

Musk, CEO of ​Tesla and X (formerly Twitter), has repeatedly‍ clashed ⁤with Gensler ‍over issues ranging from⁤ stock disclosures to cryptocurrency​ regulation. ⁤The friction stems from Musk’s penchant for⁤ pushing boundaries and Gensler’s​ commitment to enforcing securities laws.One notable point ​of contention arose in 2022 when Musk delayed disclosing his⁢ purchase of​ a meaningful stake in Twitter. The SEC questioned the timing, highlighting the importance⁢ of transparency in the stock market. Musk ultimately acquired⁣ Twitter⁤ in a $44 billion deal, later rebranding it‌ as X.

Cryptocurrency regulation has‍ also been a‌ major point‍ of contention. Musk,‍ a vocal supporter of digital‌ currencies, has clashed with ​Gensler, who views them as securities subject to SEC oversight. Gensler has expressed concerns about the potential for fraud and abuse in the crypto market.

Though, Musk’s regulatory battles with Gensler are likely to ease with the appointment⁣ of a new SEC chair. President ⁤Trump has nominated Paul Atkins, a known cryptocurrency advocate, to lead ⁢the agency. Atkins’s appointment signals a potential shift in the SEC’s approach to​ digital assets, potentially​ aligning more closely​ with Musk’s views.

the change in leadership at the SEC⁣ could have significant implications‍ for Musk’s businesses, particularly Tesla and X. A more lenient regulatory​ environment could allow ⁤Musk greater freedom to innovate and expand his ventures.

Musk​ vs. the SEC: Another Round in the Ring?

NewsDirect3.com ⁤- The Musk-SEC​ saga continues, ⁤this time focusing ​on Elon Musk’s initial Twitter stock purchases back in 2022. News broke⁣ today that the tesla ⁣CEO is facing pressure from the securities and Exchange Commission to⁣ settle charges related ⁣to alleged failure to disclose thes purchases instantly.

To‍ unpack this⁣ latest progress, we sat down with Professor Sarah ‍Jacobs, a leading expert in securities law ‍at Columbia University.

NewsDirect3: Professor ⁣Jacobs, thank⁢ you‍ for joining us.‍ Can you shed some light on what exactly⁢ the⁣ SEC is alleging against Elon ‌Musk in this case?

Professor Jacobs: Essentially,​ the SEC seems to be alleging that Mr. Musk violated federal securities ⁤laws by not disclosing his Twitter stock purchases promptly enough. These⁤ laws require major shareholders to disclose their holdings publicly within a ⁤certain timeframe.⁣ This clarity is crucial for ensuring fair and⁣ orderly markets.

NewsDirect3: Musk‍ has publicly⁣ stated on⁤ X‌ that the SEC is ‍demanding a fine and threatening criminal charges if he doesn’t comply.How significant ​could these potential ⁢penalties ‍be?

Professor Jacobs: The potential penalties are indeed significant.‍ Fines for this type of violation can reach millions of dollars,and ‌the⁢ SEC could even seek to bar Mr. Musk from serving ‌as a director or officer of publicly traded companies. The threat⁣ of ​criminal charges adds another layer of complexity and potential seriousness.

NewsDirect3: ‍ This isn’t the first ⁤time Musk ⁤has clashed⁤ with the SEC. What does this repeated tension tell​ us about the relationship between these two parties?

professor Jacobs: It’s‍ clear that there’s a strained relationship between ​Mr. Musk and the SEC. His penchant‍ for outspokenness and his​ tendency to push boundaries frequently enough puts ‌him ⁢at odds with the agency’s focus on strict compliance and regulatory oversight. This latest ‍case just adds to that already complex dynamic.

NewsDirect3: Looking forward, what are the likely scenarios in⁢ this case?

Professor‌ Jacobs: ⁣ several possibilities exist. Mr. Musk could agree to pay the⁣ fine and settle the charges,which would ⁣bring the matter to a close. Alternatively, ​he could choose to fight the charges in court, perhaps leading to a lengthy and expensive legal‌ battle.

NewsDirect3: ​Professor Jacobs, thank you for your insight into this complex ​situation. It truly seems ⁤ the fallout from Elon Musk’s Twitter acquisition is far from over.

Professor ⁤Jacobs:‌ My pleasure. It will be captivating to see how this latest chapter unfolds.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.