Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Improved Survival Rates for Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer: Key Study Findings - News Directory 3

Improved Survival Rates for Screen-Detected Colorectal Cancer: Key Study Findings

November 22, 2024 Catherine Williams Tech
News Context
At a glance
  • TOPLINE: Patients with stages I-III screen-detected colorectal cancer (CRC) have better disease-free survival rates than those with non-screen-detected CRC.
  • METHODOLOGY: A study examined the impact of screening on recurrence rates in patients aged 55-75 with CRC from the Netherlands Cancer Registry.
  • IN PRACTICE: The authors suggest that screening methods can help assess individual risks for recurrence and survival, aiding in personalized treatment approaches.
Original source: medscape.com

TOPLINE:

Patients with stages I-III screen-detected colorectal cancer (CRC) have better disease-free survival rates than those with non-screen-detected CRC. This difference is not affected by patient, tumor, or treatment characteristics.

METHODOLOGY:

A study examined the impact of screening on recurrence rates in patients aged 55-75 with CRC from the Netherlands Cancer Registry.

  • Researchers identified screen-detected CRC in patients who had a colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT).
  • Non-screen-detected CRC was diagnosed in symptomatic patients.

FINDINGS:

  • The study analyzed 3,725 patients with CRC, comprising 39.6% women.
  • Of these, 1,652 (44.3%) had screen-detected CRC, and 2,073 (55.7%) had non-screen-detected CRC.
  • Cancer was distributed evenly across stages I-III (35.3%, 27.1%, and 37.6%, respectively).
  • Screen-detected CRC showed higher 3-year disease-free survival rates (87.8% vs. 77.2%; P < 0.001).
  • Stage III cases particularly benefited, with disease-free survival rates of 77.9% for screen-detected versus 66.7% for non-screen-detected CRC (P < 0.001).
  • Screen-detected CRC was more often found at earlier stages (stage I or II: 72.4% vs. 54.4%; P < 0.001).
  • Overall, screening led to a 33% lower risk of recurrence (P < 0.001).
  • Recurrence was the strongest predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio, 15.90; P < 0.001).

IN PRACTICE:

The authors suggest that screening methods can help assess individual risks for recurrence and survival, aiding in personalized treatment approaches.

SOURCE:

The study, led by Sanne J.K.F. Pluimers from Erasmus University Medical Center, was published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

DISCLOSURES:

There was no funding for this study. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Cancer, tumor

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com