Seong-eun Jo sued the prosecution for defamation of former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol▶ Click here for a larger view
Jo Seong-eun, the informant of the so-called ‘indictment of accusation’, requested the disclosure of information from the high-ranking public officials’ crime investigation office (Public Investigation Office) for a transcript of the conversation between him and the People’s Power Rep. Kim Woong.
Cho said on his SNS on the 7th, “I deleted a lot of unnecessary stuff due to lack of capacity.”
The Ministry of Air Transport recently restored two recordings of the two phone conversations around April 3, last year, when Cho received a complaint from Rep. Kim against passport figures including Yoo Si-min, chairman of the Roh Moo-hyung Foundation.
Although the Ministry of Public Security may not officially respond to the request for information disclosure with the security of the investigation at the forefront, there is a possibility that the recovered conversation contents will be disclosed through Mr.
In the transcript of the recovered file, Rep. Kim said, “We will send a complaint letter,” expressing the subject of the complaint as ‘we’ and emphasizing that it should be submitted to the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.
In the first call, he even designated the reception desk saying, “Go to the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office. It’s safe there.”
The transcript also contains specific contents such as “I have to act as if the prosecution was forcibly received”, “If Jae (Kim Woong) visits the great swordsman, Yoon Seok-yeol ordered it, so I have to get out of it.” passed on
Cho has been insisting that he spoke with Rep. Kim only once since the beginning of the allegations, and that at the time, Rep. Kim emphasized that “the payment should be made to the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, not the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office.”
On the other hand, it is also being talked about that the air defense agency may have already caught clues to the originator of the complaint and how it was delivered from the recovered call.
Lawmakers from the Democratic Party’s Legislative and Judiciary Committee held an emergency press conference on the same day and said, “Isn’t ‘we’ and ‘the Great Prosecutor’ Yoon Seok-yeol, former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol, former Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Investigation and Information Policy Officer Sohn Woong, and Rep. Kim Woong, who resigned just three months ago? “A detention investigation seems inevitable,” he condemned.
Previously, the Airborne Service conducted a search and seizure in the office of Rep. Kim Woong, but returned empty-handed, and it was known that Rep. Kim’s cell phone was also replaced every six months, making it difficult to confirm the contents of the conversation.
It is predicted that a summons investigation will be conducted soon, as the National Power Rep. Jeong Jeong-sik and lawyer Jo Sang-gyu were seized and searched the day before, and the route of delivery of the complaint within the United Future Party at the time is also being traced.
In the morning of that day, lawyer Cho visited the Airborne Service to observe cell phone forensics and met with reporters, saying, “I received a draft of the accusation letter and there was no warning from the party to ‘be careful’.”
[연합뉴스]
Copyrights ⓒ Yonhap News. Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited
