The Don Mueang District Court ordered “Keng Lai Phong” to be imprisoned for 10 months and 40 days without parole. after the prosecutor asked for additional and positive penalties In the case of posting to invite online gambling
On 11 May, 2023, Mr Kosolwat Intuchanyong Deputy Spokesman of the Attorney General’s Office He revealed that he had received information from Mr. Surasak Siriwat, Special Prosecutor for District Court Office 9 (Don Mueang) that prosecutor District Court Litigation Office 9 brought Mr. Chirayu or Panya Yimampai or Keng Lai Cuddliw as the defendants for their crimes by publishing, advertising and persuading others to gamble (online gambling) without consent The defendant pleaded guilty to all charges to the investigating officer. Technology Crime Investigation Division
The plaintiff’s prosecutor filed a lawsuit against the defendant on February 5. The defendant dared to help publish, advertise, persuade, either directly or indirectly, the public to participate in gambling. Online through the TIKTOK application, which offers a wide range of gambling games such as slot games, casino games, baccarat and other gambling games. and it is a channel to use Register to gamble. And is used to connect between the party that organizes gaming, which is the dealer’s side, serving with the player’s side. There is a way to play. Players must apply for membership through Line Add. and then transfer the membership fee and betting money to the designated bank account
The player will then receive a user ID (username) and password (password) and a website link for clicking to access different types of online gaming. The credit balance will be displayed. (Betting amount) on the website according to the amount the player transfers money to the account. Then the players will be able to play gambling games. If you play and win, you will get extra Credit or if you lose, you will lose credit at the rate stated on the website. such credits players can withdraw Come out as money or transfer money to the account to play more bets. which is gambling under section 4 bis
On March 10, the past The defendant dared to help publish, advertise, persuade, either directly or indirectly, for the public to participate in gambling. online through the YOUTUBE application, account name “KENG LAIPRANG”, where the defendant posted a video clip inviting him to gamble by getting his followers to click into the Line Ad, which is a way of contacting gaming website. In order to have online gambling through the internet, the website has a wide variety of gambling games such as slot games, casino games, baccarat and other gambling games and is a channel for applying for gambling. And is used to connect between parties that organize gambling, namely parties The dealer works with the player’s side. There is a way to play. Players must apply for membership via Line Add and then transfer the membership fee and betting money to the designated bank account.
The player will then receive a user ID (username) and password (password) and a website link for clicking to access different types of online gaming, which will appear as a credit (amount used to bet) on the website according to the amount the player Transfer money to the account After that, players will be able to play gambling games. If they win, they will receive more credits, or if they lose, they will lose credits at the rate stated on the website, where such credits can be withdrawn as money or transferred into money. in the account to play more bets which is gambling under section 4 bis
against the law The reason for the prosecution occurred in Thung Song Hong Subdistrict, Lak Si District, Bangkok all over the kingdom intertwined
Later, on May 10, at noon after the incident the defendant met with the investigating officer. The investigator has already informed the allegations, and during the investigation, the defendant confessed. so he sent the accused to court with prosecution
At the end of the petition, the plaintiff’s prosecutor said that Before this case, the accused had been sentenced to the final judgment. of Thanyaburi Provincial Court To punish imprisonment for 6 months, fine 1 thousand, imprisonment, suspension of punishment for one year for offenses under the Gambling Act and within the period that the court has suspended the punishment in such cases. The defendant has committed another crime in this case, which is not a crime committed through negligence or misconduct. He therefore asked the court to imprison the accused pending punishment in a criminal case. of the Thanyaburi Provincial Court to add to the defendant’s punishment in this case as well
And before this case, the defendant was sentenced to the final judgment of the Criminal Court to prison for 3 years and 4 months. The offense of possessing a category 1 narcotic (methamphetamine) for sale. Which sentencing on August 23, 2017. The defendant was released from the above case on December 13, 2020 within five years from the date of release in the above case. The defendant committed another crime in this case. Ask the court to increase the penalty for the defendant by 1 in 3 in accordance with Section 92 of the Criminal Code.
Request to punish the defendant in accordance with Section 4 bis, 5,6,10,12 of the Gambling Act and request the court to increase the punishment and add the defendant’s imprisonment in the Thanyaburi Provincial Court criminal case pending for a penalty to be added to the penalty in this case as well
by that court The defendant is guilty according to Under the Gambling Act, the defendant’s actions are many different offences, punishing each action as a count down according to the Criminal Code, Section 91, imprisonment for 4 months, 2 counts, a total of 8 months imprisonment, increasing the defendant’s sentence by 1 count. in 3 in accordance with Section 92 of the Criminal Code imprisonment for 5 months and 10 days per count, total imprisonment for 10 months and 20 days 2 counts, including 4 months and 40 days imprisonment, plus 6 months imprisonment per defendant awaiting sentence from the Thanyaburi Court along with the defendant’s imprisonment in this regard. cause.
Complete imprisonment of 10 months and 40 days. Considering the circumstances of the case, it was found that the defendant had committed the same offense before. If there is no reason to wait for punishment
