Kimmel Return: Nexstar, Sinclair Alternatives for Viewers
- This article details the ongoing dispute between Jimmy Kimmel and Sinclair Broadcast Group, and the impact of Sinclair's decision to blackout jimmy Kimmel Live!
- * The Dispute: Sinclair initially suspended airing jimmy Kimmel Live!
- In essence, the article suggests that Sinclair's attempt to censor Kimmel ultimately proved ineffective and may have even increased his reach and popularity through the power of digital...
Summary of the Article: Jimmy kimmel & Sinclair Broadcast Group Dispute
This article details the ongoing dispute between Jimmy Kimmel and Sinclair Broadcast Group, and the impact of Sinclair’s decision to blackout jimmy Kimmel Live! on its stations. Hear’s a breakdown of the key points:
* The Dispute: Sinclair initially suspended airing jimmy Kimmel Live! following kimmel’s monologue criticizing conservative figures. They demanded meetings with ABC/Disney regarding ”professionalism and accountability” before reinstating the show.
* Sinclair Backs Down (Partially): Sinclair has now agreed to air the show again, but only after ABC/Disney meet certain demands, including an autonomous network-wide ombudsman. ABC/Disney have not accepted these proposals.
* Kimmel’s Successful Return: Despite the blackouts, Kimmel’s return episode achieved record-high ratings - the highest in over a decade for a regularly scheduled episode. His monologue went viral on YouTube, garnering over 21 million views.
* Impact of Blackouts: Sixty-six ABC affiliate stations blacked out Kimmel’s return, costing them potential viewership and market share.
* Digital Platforms Benefit: Experts argue the blackouts backfired on Sinclair, driving viewers to digital platforms like YouTube where the content spread rapidly and reached a wider audience. Viewers easily found the show on digital cable or YouTube if it wasn’t aired locally.
* Broader Implications: The situation highlights the changing media landscape and questions the role of conventional broadcast media in fulfilling the “public interest, necessity and convenience” in an age of readily available digital content.
In essence, the article suggests that Sinclair’s attempt to censor Kimmel ultimately proved ineffective and may have even increased his reach and popularity through the power of digital distribution.
