In the JoongAng Ilbo report, Lee Jae-myung, chairman of the Democratic Social gathering of Korea, stated at a new assembly of the Supreme Council that he was ready to settle for the ‘Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecution Act’ and ‘if the put up of exclusive prosecutor is in their need to have for statements relating to me’. Even throughout the presidential election, I have been indicating that a unique prosecutor is essential.” It looks to be a response that expressed the intention to connect the specific prosecutor in Daejang-dong and the particular prosecutor Kim Gun-hee.
With regards to irrespective of whether to reply to the prosecution’s request (observe of subpoena) similar to the dissemination of phony info, this sort of as Baek Hyun-dong’s feedback that the use was changed owing to threats, and Kim Moon-gi, the previous head of growth of the group. The Seongnam Urban Development Corporation, reported it did not know “We are gathering opinions.”
Chairman Lee made the pursuing assertion right after assembly with reporters immediately after the assembly of the Supreme Council presided about in the meeting area of the Party Associates of the Countrywide Assembly this morning. In response to a reporter’s concern, “Is it genuine that the report that Mrs. Kim Kun-hee reported that there could be a dual unique prosecutor place is real, or is it genuine that they said there was community suspicion and that it should really be? fixed?”, CEO Lee claimed, “I explained that the Hwacheon Daeyu difficulty requires to be continued even during the presidential election. I gave it,” he replied.
There was an belief in the celebration not to seem in the prosecution’s summons regarding the unfold of phony information. Then, the elevator doorway closed with out answering the media present day reporter’s issue, ‘Do you admit to the prosecution’s suspicion of spreading wrong information?’
Earlier, the JoongAng Ilbo noted on the entrance page of the write-up on the 5th, ‘Lee Jae-myung summons ‘Democratic Celebration Unique Prosecutor Act Anti-Return Card Kim Geon-hee,’ in accordance to a number of attendees that is not Now , it seems that lots of doubts have been elevated to the extent that I you should not even know what they are. That will be the way to expose the reality.” The JoongAng Ilbo described that CEO Lee ongoing, “I am ready to accept any special prosecution on suspicions associated to me along with the ‘Kim Gun-hee Particular Prosecution Act’.” A party formal stated, “It could also mean that a exclusive prosecutor who is much less motivated by the authorities is greater than the prosecution,” the newspaper documented.
With regards to this, Park Seong-joon, spokesman for the Democratic Occasion of Korea, responded to a reporter’s question about the authenticity of this JoongAng Ilbo report just after the assembly of the Supreme Council on the morning of the 5th. This is, and the opposition talks a ton, but was not he conversing from a principled place of look at about regardless of whether it would be right for a unique prosecutor to very clear up his uncertainties?” he discussed.
With regards to the system to endorse Kim Gun-hee’s exclusive prosecutor regulation as a celebration debate, Park’s spokesman replied, “Today’s National Assembly will be a turning point.”
When some of the top rated members of the Supreme Council were requested about Lee’s opposition to the prosecution, Spokesman Park said, “There have been quite a few discussions about attendance and non-visual appeal, but as a spokesperson, the aim is on non-appearance.” out,” he reported.
Consultant Lee made a assertion that he threatened to crack down on Baekhyun-dong if he did not build a use case for Baekhyun-dong during a state inspection on October 20 previous calendar year, and △ appeared in Joo Young’s SBS news briefing -jin in December. 22 previous calendar year and stated, ‘I failed to know who Kim Moon-gi was.’ When requested if he recognized the prosecution’s declare that his feedback amounted to the publication of phony details beneath the Public Official Elections Act, Spokesperson Park Seong-joon replied, “It really should be stated that it is.”
When requested if he would make a penned statement if he was not current, Speaker Park replied, “Yes. It truly is not that I will not attend, it’s just the lack of attendance is the middle of gravity, so I’ll have to explain the linked written content.”
Asked why the prosecution did not submit a created response to the assertion that they did not know Kim Moon-gi by the 31st, but did not submit it, spokesman Park Seong-joon claimed, “I will check that.”
In the meantime, Representative Chung Cheong-rae mentioned, “I never believe there is a need to have to answer to the prosecution’s unreasonable ask for for the presence of social gathering leader Lee Jae-myung,” he claimed. “You should by no means react to the request to establish a trap and open up the entice doorway,” he explained.
Consultant Jang Kyung-tae also claimed at the Supreme Council assembly, “I oppose the presence of celebration chief Jae-myung Lee in the prosecution.” He said, “Even if a summons is created as normal, when new doubts arise or when there are some clues, they are summoned with the acceptance of the courtroom. I was requested to be present,” he mentioned. Agent Jang stated, “This is the facts unveiled on the point out audit or broadcast. What are you likely to communicate about?
