Leighton Clarke: New Zealander of the Year Nomination Withdrawn After Controversial Videos
Hamilton, New Zealand – Leighton Clarke, known online as Uncle Tics, has had his New Zealander of the Year Local Hero nomination withdrawn following concerns over content posted to his social media accounts. The 32-year-old, a prominent disability advocate who has amassed 4.7 million followers on TikTok by openly sharing his experiences with Tourette Syndrome, was informed of the decision by award organizers after a review of his publicly available digital content.
The withdrawal stemmed from two separate videos Clarke posted. The first, which sparked initial controversy, featured Clarke reacting to a video of a woman who had publicly disclosed cheating on her partner and contracting a sexually transmitted disease. Clarke admitted to laughing at the situation, stating he “thought that was pretty calm” and that others online were reacting more harshly. He subsequently apologized, acknowledging that his response “maybe [was] a bit far.”
The second video proved to be the final point of contention. Described as a “stupid, stupid comedy skit,” it involved Clarke wearing glasses obscuring his vision and appearing to look under his wife’s skirt. According to Clarke, this led directly to the award organizers informing him that his nomination was being rescinded. “I got a message from the New Zealander of the Year people saying, ‘oh we’ve dropped you, we’re kicking you out of this’,” he recounted on Dave Letele’s Unfiltered podcast.
Clarke expressed frustration with the decision, stating he inquired whether organizers were aware of the nature of his content prior to the nomination. He claims they responded affirmatively. Despite his disappointment, Clarke maintains a positive outlook, stating he was “a bit upset” but held no ill will towards the organization. He also emphasized his belief that his contributions to the community extend beyond external validation. “And real talk, I don’t need a f****** medal to know I’ve done right by my community,” he posted to Instagram following the podcast appearance.
The New Zealander of the Year Awards acknowledged Clarke’s contributions, stating they had reviewed his publicly available content as part of a standard process. They noted that while they respect his right to express his views, subsequent content he posted was not consistent with the values underpinning the awards. Despite the withdrawal of his nomination for the Local Hero of the Year Award, Clarke was still awarded a Local Hero Medal in recognition of his work in reshaping conversations around disability.
“We appreciate the positive contribution Leighton has made in reshaping conversations about disability, which led to him receiving a Local Hero Medal,” the organization stated. This acknowledgement highlights the complex nature of the situation, recognizing Clarke’s positive impact while simultaneously addressing concerns about the appropriateness of his online content.
Clarke’s online persona is characterized by a willingness to openly discuss his Tourette’s Syndrome, including the involuntary vocalizations and behaviors associated with the condition. He has described himself as having a “dark humour” and stated, “I’m a dark-humoured fella, I’ve got Tourette’s, I’m going to call you an N-word, a c*** or a bastard. I’m going to say s*** you don’t like. Might as well live it and own it.” This unapologetic approach, while resonating with many of his followers, appears to have clashed with the values of the New Zealander of the Year Awards.
The incident raises broader questions about the boundaries of online expression, particularly for public figures and those nominated for awards that emphasize community values. The New Zealander of the Year Awards website states that the award recognizes “those whose actions have had a significant and lasting impact in their communities.” The case of Leighton Clarke demonstrates the challenges of reconciling a commitment to inclusivity and recognizing positive contributions with the need to uphold certain standards of conduct, even in the often-unfiltered world of social media.
The controversy has sparked considerable discussion online, with many commenters expressing support for Clarke and praising his authenticity. “Award or no award, you’re a legend,” one commenter wrote. Another stated, “I’m not even from New Zealand but you are still my Local Hero.” This outpouring of support underscores the significant impact Clarke has had on his audience and the appreciation for his willingness to share his experiences openly and honestly.
Clarke’s story serves as a reminder that navigating the complexities of public life in the digital age requires careful consideration of the potential consequences of online actions. While his nomination may have been withdrawn, his advocacy work and the positive impact he has had on the conversation surrounding disability remain undeniable.