Lower Med Costs: Patient Choice & Savings
- Rising prices for essential goods and services highlight the need for transparency, especially in the complex drug pricing system.
- Biologic drugs have transformed the treatment of conditions like cancer and rheumatologic diseases as the late 1990s.
- Biosimilars, as cost-saving alternatives, face hurdles despite FDA approval pathways designed to ensure their effectiveness and patient safety.
Biosimilars key to Addressing Drug Pricing, Access Challenges
Updated June 7, 2025
Rising prices for essential goods and services highlight the need for transparency, especially in the complex drug pricing system. biosimilars represent a cost-effective option for patients managing chronic diseases, offering similar benefits to biologic treatments at a lower price.
Biologic drugs have transformed the treatment of conditions like cancer and rheumatologic diseases as the late 1990s. Though, their complex production leads to high costs and intricate administration, frequently enough requiring injections or infusions.
Biosimilars, as cost-saving alternatives, face hurdles despite FDA approval pathways designed to ensure their effectiveness and patient safety. Dr. Colin Edgerton, a rheumatologist, testified before Congress about barriers to accessing these medications, citing flawed reimbursement policies and profit-driven practices by insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs).
The American College of Rheumatology has long advocated for better biosimilar reimbursement. Medicare Part D’s cost-sharing structure and PBM underpayments create a gap between the cost of acquiring and administering biosimilars and physician reimbursement, impacting patient access.
While biosimilars are initially 15% to 35% cheaper than their reference drugs, these savings often don’t reach patients due to Part D cost-sharing rules.A 2018 study showed that while 96% of Part D plans covered the biologic infliximab, only 10% covered its biosimilar, infliximab-dyyb. Patients often faced higher costs for the biosimilar despite its lower list price.
Reimbursements below acquisition costs further limit biosimilar use. PBMs negotiate rebates with manufacturers, influencing formulary placement but not reducing the cost for physician practices. This can lead to practices losing money when prescribing biosimilars.
This especially hurts smaller, self-reliant, and rural rheumatology practices. Dr. Edgerton detailed proposals in his congressional testimony to address these challenges and improve patient access to biosimilars.
“The lack of transparency in drug pricing and the profit-driven PBM rebate system are distorting the marketplace and preventing patients from benefiting from the cost savings that these innovative treatments could provide,” Edgerton said.
What’s next
Congress and the administration are urged to collaborate on increasing transparency in drug pricing to create a fairer marketplace for both providers and patients, ensuring wider access to cost-effective biosimilars.
