Military Gaming: Strategy, Tactics, and More

summary of the Article: Military Gaming & Training – A competitive Imperative

This article argues that the US military needs to fully embrace and invest in game-like training‍ simulations to maintain its competitive edge against nations like China and Russia, who are already⁤ doing so. Here’s a breakdown of ‍the key points:

Why Military Gaming is Effective:

Adaptation: dynamic scenarios in⁢ gaming ⁣force soldiers ⁢to develop mental agility ⁢and quickly adjust to unexpected challenges, mirroring real-world warfare.
Systems Thinking: Gaming helps visualize the interconnectedness of various systems ⁤(tech, logistics, human elements) and⁣ understand the ripple effects of decisions.
Stress Inoculation: Competitive gaming environments create pressure that simulates combat stress, building‍ resilience and improving performance under duress.

China: The PLA is actively “upgrading” existing games and wargaming systems, utilizing VR,⁤ simulation ⁤labs, and metaverse environments for training across multiple specialties (parachute training, artillery, air defense, reconnaissance). They are even simulating strikes against US-relevant targets.
* Russia: Russian military schools are incorporating PC-based simulators for drone warfare training, and a video game (“Squad 22: Care”) is reportedly recommended by the military for training purposes.

The Call to Action:

The article stresses that the US must recognize this trend as core tradecraft and allocate resources accordingly. It’s not a novelty, but a crucial element of modern force preparation.In essence, the article paints a picture of a rapidly evolving training landscape where⁣ the US risks falling behind if ‍it doesn’t fully integrate commercial game technology, VR, and simulators into its standard training procedures.