Newsletter

‘Padipat’ plans to sue ‘Srisuwan’, petitioning the Electoral Commission to quash the alleged Speech progress against the institution

‘Padipat’ plans to sue ‘Srisuwan’, asking Electoral Commission to dissolve Kao Klai Party Alleged speech against the organization

on March 21 Padipat Santipada Mr The interim candidate for Phitsanulok District 1, Kao Klai Party (Kor Kor.), said that of the case Srisuwan Chanya Mr Secretary General of the Association for the Protection of the Constitution of Thailand Petition to the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) to investigate him and allegations of a campaign speech referring to the monarchy Which is punishable by the dissolution of that party The incident that happened that day, it invited by Phitsanulok Civic Training Club. which is an organization that promotes the political participation of the people of Phitsanulok and gives the citizens of Phitsanulok the opportunity to ask questions and talk to candidates from different political parties

Padipat said Mr. He was the first person invited to join the event. Questions were asked regarding: 1) problems that should be tackled urgently; Based on my experience as an MP, 2) what is the policy that will make Phitsanulok more prosperous and 3) what is the policy on decentralization and preventing corruption?

Padipat said Mr. At the event, people from all groups were invited to listen to the vision. One of the groups invited to join the discussion was the group of Mrs. Naengnoi Asawakittikorn Leader of the Legal Aid Center for Victims of Online Harassment (NASC), which has been involved in prosecuting people across the country under Section 112 throughout the past. After the main question-based policy discussions were over, giving the public a chance to ask questions On behalf of Mrs Naengnoi she went on to say that the organizers were supposed to trick her into listening to the campaign before taking angry stance ask him a question why he had to bail a person accused of Section 112 and why there is a need for a policy to amend Section 112

Padipat who said that Mr. He answered this question is divided into 3 issues: 1) Politically accused bail made to confirm the rule of law as long as the court does not have a final judgment It must first be assumed that the accused person is innocent. and not being entitled to bail is a flaw in the justice process and with a political cause Many people think it is not considered a crime. 2) Explain the progressive party’s stance towards Article 112 and explain how there were problems in the text and its enforcement.

Mr Padipat said that and 3) budgetary problems relating to royal institutions and projects which have been increasing steadily over the past few years. and also difficult to verify He explained that this is the budget used by different agencies. not his personal expenses should be reviewed for transparency Especially in projects where the word Royal Enterprise is used. and many projects found it to be an unreasonable use of the budget If it is not examined, it will be a source of corruption from different agencies.

“I affirm my innocence. And confirm that a campaign is not all that has been said and not even on the agenda of the event But arising from Q&A outside the round It is an agenda that is happening. the fact that Mrs Naengnoi and those on the right aim to destroy the democratic movement. and the Progressive Party handed over the child to someone like Srisuwan, who was not a person with credibility in the society for a long time, who brought him forward,” said Mr Padipat.

Padipat said Mr What is worth noting is that Mr Srisuwan’s petition for accepting children from Nang Naeng Noi this time has any hidden benefits or not. From now on, waiting to see the rhetoric from the Electoral Commission, and if it is found to be a fake petition, Mr Srisuwan and Mrs Naengnoi will definitely be prosecuted. Because this is not the usual criticism. but deliberately creates a legal burden on the KG party without necessity And also claims things that the CRC did not do, which is considered a harm to the CRC and to itself, what will be the prosecution measures? Or will he proceed to sue back or not? The party will reconsider after receiving the rhetoric.

Padipat said Mr application to the Election Commission at that time The Electoral Commission is called an independent body. Opinion when receiving applications, pointing information, appointing an examination committee Until the case is presented to the Constitutional Court it must be carried out impartially not act as a weapon to attack opponents of the government if the Electoral Commission can prove itself on this point People will also have more confidence in the fairness of this election.

Read related news.