Home » Business » Pension Glide Path: Avoid Savings Crash

Pension Glide Path: Avoid Savings Crash

The Perils of⁣ Pension ​Default Funds: Why You Need to ⁤Take Control

“To⁢ make it easy ​and frictionless for people to join pension schemes,” says⁢ Jesal Mistry, head‌ of DC investment governance ​at Legal & General Investment Management. “They are designed ⁣to cater to as broad a group of people ⁣as ​possible.” While auto-enrolment and default ‍funds have undeniably boosted pension saving, a critical look reveals a potential flaw: a one-size-fits-all approach that may not suit everyone. This ⁤article explores the limitations of default funds and⁣ why taking control of your pension investments is more important ​than⁢ ever.

The Glide Path: A Risky Descent?

Pensions companies⁤ typically employ a “glide path,” gradually shifting investments from possibly ⁢high-growth equities to⁣ safer,‌ but⁣ lower-yielding, bonds as ⁤investors approach retirement. This strategy aims‍ to protect accumulated savings from market volatility. Though, the analogy of a glide path is surprisingly⁣ apt – a poorly calculated descent can end in a crash.

Research from the Pensions Policy institute (disclosure: I’m a trustee of this charity,⁢ my views are my ⁣own) illustrates this shift. Typically, a default fund ⁢investor might have two-thirds ​of their money in equities 20 years​ from retirement. By their chosen retirement date, that figure flips to ⁤two-thirds in bonds and​ cash. ⁤While ‍seemingly sensible, this de-risking ‍process isn’t ‍universally optimal.

Why Default Funds Fall short

auto-enrolment has ⁣successfully encouraged widespread pension participation, and default funds offer⁣ a convenient option⁢ for⁢ those who lack the time, knowledge, or inclination‌ to manage their own investments. Though, their inherent generality⁣ is a meaningful drawback.

Recent adjustments to accommodate‌ the abolition of compulsory annuities and ⁢the rise of drawdown products haven’t fully addressed the issue. Many default funds still reduce equity exposure too aggressively as we​ age, potentially sacrificing⁣ long-term ‌growth. This⁢ is especially​ problematic for individuals with⁢ specific circumstances.

Are You a Default Fund Misfit?

Consider these scenarios:

Substantial Backup Assets: If you have a defined⁢ benefit pension or plan to sell a business, ⁢you may be comfortable maintaining ‍higher equity exposure for continued growth.
Health & Financial Situation: Conversely, poor health or limited financial resources might warrant a faster shift to ⁤lower-risk investments, even ahead of planned retirement. Individual Risk Tolerance: A‌ default fund cannot accurately assess your⁣ personal appetite for risk.

These examples highlight why blindly accepting a default fund’s⁣ glide path can ‍be detrimental. It’s crucial to remember that retirement planning isn’t a standardized ‌process; it’s deeply⁢ personal.

Taking Control: Customizing Your Investment Strategy

Don’t succumb to ​inertia. Actively ⁢review the specifications of your default fund.⁤ most‌ pension ‌providers⁢ allow you to adjust your glide path by modifying ⁢the retirement ‍age​ you specify – this⁢ doesn’t​ necessarily need‍ to align with your actual retirement date.⁤ Extending the timeframe can maintain higher equity exposure for longer.

Alternatively,you can move your money out of the default ⁢fund‌ entirely ‍and⁢ invest in options you‌ believe are more suitable.⁤ I personally took this route​ with ​an older workplace scheme, finding ‍the bond allocation accelerated too quickly⁢ for ⁣my needs.

The UK Private Asset Question

The government⁢ is increasingly​ encouraging investment in UK private assets.However,I remain sceptical. Costs‍ are often high,and historical performance data can be⁣ unreliable. Concerns around illiquidity and ‌concentrated market exposure further fuel my hesitation.

Furthermore, I’m wary of political pressure to invest in specific asset classes. Unless convincingly persuaded or else, ⁤I intend to opt⁢ out ⁤of default funds‍ and pursue a more tailored investment strategy. I’m not alone in⁢ this sentiment,and a growing ⁤number of informed ‌investors are questioning the blanket approach ⁤to pension investment.

Jonathan Guthrie‍ is a ‍writer, an adviser⁤ and a former head of Lex; jonathanbuchananguthrie@gmail.com*

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.