PH China Binding Arbitral Award – Foreign Govt Support
International Community Reaffirms Support for South China Sea Arbitral Award
MANILA, Philippines – A coalition of nations has reiterated their unwavering support for the 2016 Arbitral Award on the South China Sea, emphasizing its legally binding nature and its crucial role in maintaining regional peace and stability. The statements come as tensions continue to simmer in the disputed waters, with several countries condemning China’s assertive actions.
Nations Unite Behind Rule of Law in South China Sea
The international community’s commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the landmark 2016 arbitral ruling was clearly articulated by several key global players. These nations stressed that adherence to international law is paramount for the peaceful resolution of maritime disputes and for fostering shared prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region.
Japan’s Commitment to a Free and Open Order
Japan, thru its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, declared its firm stance on the South China Sea issue. “Japan will comply with the award and it will lead to the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Sea,” the ministry stated. Moreover,Japan pledged to collaborate with the international community,including ASEAN Member States and the United States,to “maintain and strengthen the free and open international order based on the rule of law.” This commitment underscores Japan’s dedication to upholding international norms and principles in the face of escalating regional challenges.
Canada’s ‘Unwavering’ Stance Against Coercive Actions
Global Affairs Canada echoed this sentiment, affirming Ottawa’s “unwavering” commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Canada unequivocally stated that the July 12, 2016, decision is “legally binding on the parties and provides a foundation for the peaceful resolution of competing maritime claims in the region, consistent with international law.”
The Canadian foreign affairs department did not shy away from criticizing China’s recent conduct. It specifically condemned China’s “coercive and dangerous actions” against Philippine and Vietnamese vessels, citing the use of water cannons, dangerous maneuvers, ramming, forcible towing, and unlawful boarding. These actions, Canada argued, not only endanger seafarers but also “seriously degrade regional peace and security.” Canada reiterated its call for China to abide by the tribunal’s decision and cease all actions that escalate tensions and threaten maritime safety.
The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade underscored the obligation of all parties to abide by the ruling, describing it as “unanimous, clear, and binding.” Australia emphasized that UNCLOS ratification signifies a commitment to its freedoms, rights, and obligations, including compulsory dispute settlement procedures.
“The rule of law and good international citizenship mean states cannot simply choose whether or not to abide by rulings they dislike,” Australia stated. “The Arbitral Tribunal’s 12 July 2016 findings are final and binding on the Philippines and China.” Australia pledged to continue urging parties to comply with the decision and to resolve disputes peacefully in accordance with international law, asserting that “adherence to international law is essential for shared prosperity and a stable and peaceful region.”
New Zealand’s call for Respect and Peaceful Resolution
New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade aligned with this position, conveying its sustained backing for the Arbitral Award. On the ninth anniversary of the ruling, New Zealand urged parties to “respect the ruling on maritime rights in the South China Sea as final and binding.” The ministry highlighted that “peaceful resolution of disputes in accordance with UNCLOS - the Constitution for the Oceans – is essential to regional stability.”
Broader Diplomatic Support
Along with these detailed statements, the foreign missions in Manila representing Germany, South Korea, France, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and the Netherlands also issued similar statements of support, both publicly and on their respective social media accounts. This broad diplomatic consensus reinforces the international community’s collective commitment to the rule of law and the peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea.