Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Pharmaceutical Wholesalers: Hidden Role & Impact

October 5, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
  • A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events - including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular⁢ death - in individuals with...
  • The SELECT ‍trial⁣ specifically focused on adults⁢ with obesity (BMI of 30 or higher) *and* pre-existing ⁤cardiovascular disease,⁣ such as heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease.
  • The increased risk, while statistically significant, is crucial to contextualize.
Original source: nejm.org

Ozempic ⁣and Cardiovascular Risk: ‍New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny

Table of Contents

  • Ozempic ⁣and Cardiovascular Risk: ‍New Findings Demand Closer Scrutiny
    • What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial
    • Understanding ‍the ⁤SELECT Trial: Key Details
    • What Dose This Mean? Beyond ‍the Headlines
    • Who is Affected? Identifying At-Risk Individuals

What Happened? A Closer Look at the SELECT Trial

A major clinical trial, the SELECT trial, has revealed a potential increased risk of cardiovascular events – including heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular⁢ death – in individuals with obesity and established cardiovascular disease who were treated with ‍semaglutide (Ozempic). the study, involving⁢ over 17,600 participants, showed a statistically significant, though relatively small, increase in these events compared to a placebo group. This‍ finding challenges previous assumptions about⁢ the cardiovascular safety of⁤ GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide.

What: Increased cardiovascular event risk observed in obese⁣ patients with established heart disease taking semaglutide (Ozempic).
⁢
Where: International, multi-center clinical trial (SELECT trial).
⁣
When: Results published August 17, 2023 (Ahead of Print, New England Journal of⁣ Medicine).
why⁣ it Matters: Re-evaluates the cardiovascular safety profile of semaglutide, impacting prescribing practices.
What’s next: Further research needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and identify at-risk ⁤populations.

Understanding ‍the ⁤SELECT Trial: Key Details

The SELECT ‍trial⁣ specifically focused on adults⁢ with obesity (BMI of 30 or higher) *and* pre-existing ⁤cardiovascular disease,⁣ such as heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. Participants were randomly ⁢assigned to receive either 2.4 mg of semaglutide weekly or a placebo, in addition to their standard cardiovascular care.The primary outcome was the frist occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial⁣ infarction, nonfatal⁣ stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Over an average of 3.4 years, the semaglutide group experienced a 1.7% rate of these events, compared to 0.8%‍ in the placebo group – a hazard ratio of ⁣2.03.

Outcome semaglutide Group (2.4mg) Placebo Group
Cardiovascular death 0.8% 0.5%
Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction 0.9% 0.3%
Nonfatal Stroke 0.7% 0.3%
Unstable⁤ Angina (Hospitalization) 0.3% 0.2%
Composite Rate (Primary Outcome) 1.7% 0.8%

What Dose This Mean? Beyond ‍the Headlines

The increased risk, while statistically significant, is crucial to contextualize. The absolute risk difference was relatively small – a 0.9% increase in cardiovascular events over the study period. However,for individuals⁢ already at high cardiovascular risk,even a small increase is clinically meaningful. The findings suggest that semaglutide may not be universally ⁤cardioprotective, ⁤and its use in this specific population requires careful consideration.

-⁢ drjenniferchen

This trial is a crucial reminder that drugs aren’t ⁢one-size-fits-all. The initial enthusiasm surrounding GLP-1 agonists for weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefits was largely based on studies‍ in *lower* risk populations – primarily those with type 2 ‍diabetes. The SELECT trial demonstrates that extending these benefits to individuals with established heart disease isn’t‍ guaranteed, and may even be detrimental. We need to move beyond broad generalizations and focus on individualized risk-benefit assessments.

Who is Affected? Identifying At-Risk Individuals

The primary concern centers on individuals with both obesity *and* pre-existing‍ cardiovascular disease. This includes those⁤ with a history of ‍heart attack, stroke, peripheral artery disease, or unstable ⁣angina.Individuals without established cardiovascular disease likely face a different risk profile, and the findings of SELECT do not necessarily apply

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Keep reading

  • California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Gilead Sciences in HIV Drug Case
  • Two Georgia Horses Test Positive for West Nile Virus

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com