Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World

Preeclampsia Risk: Aspirin Gaps & New Study Findings

July 18, 2025 Jennifer Chen Health
News Context
At a glance
Original source: news-medical.net

New Study Questions ​USPSTF‌ Guidelines for ⁢Preeclampsia Risk, Highlights Need for Personalized Prediction

Table of Contents

  • New Study Questions ​USPSTF‌ Guidelines for ⁢Preeclampsia Risk, Highlights Need for Personalized Prediction
    • USPSTF Guidelines Under Scrutiny⁣ for ‍Preeclampsia Risk Assessment
    • The Rising Tide of Preeclampsia and the Need for ⁤innovation
    • A Call for Clearer, Objective Risk Prediction

Boston,‍ MA – A recent ⁢study published in JAMA Network Open is raising critical questions‍ about the effectiveness⁤ of current guidelines for identifying pregnant individuals ‍at risk⁢ for preeclampsia, a potentially life-threatening ​condition. The findings suggest that‌ the U.S. ​Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines, ​while well-intentioned, may be over-identifying moderate-risk pregnancies, leading to overwhelmed care teams and⁢ potentially reduced patient⁢ compliance ‌with preventive measures like low-dose aspirin.

USPSTF Guidelines Under Scrutiny⁣ for ‍Preeclampsia Risk Assessment

The study,led by Dr. Thomas McElrath, vice president of clinical development at Mirvie and a maternal-fetal medicine physician at Mass General Brigham, analyzed the utility of the USPSTF guidelines in predicting preeclampsia. The guidelines recommend low-dose aspirin⁤ for pregnant⁤ individuals at high⁢ risk for developing preeclampsia, typically starting⁤ at 12⁤ weeks of gestation. Though, the research indicates‌ that a⁢ meaningful majority of pregnant women fall into the “moderate risk” category, ⁣a classification that ​appears to lack strong predictive ‍power.

“Identifying ‌9 out of 10 women as at risk is not helping​ and⁢ overburdens care teams and pregnant patients, too,” stated ⁣dr.‌ McElrath. “physicians might potentially be reluctant to ‍prescribe aspirin⁣ when the majority of their patients fall⁢ into the moderate risk category. This is compounded ​by less than 25% compliance‌ with aspirin ‌use‌ by patients in the moderate risk category.”

The study found that‌ 70.3% of pregnant women in‌ their cohort were classified as moderate risk according to​ USPSTF guidelines. Crucially,having one or​ more moderate risk ‍factors without any high-risk factors did not reliably predict preeclampsia. ‍Even among those with two or more moderate risk factors but no high-risk factors, only nulliparity (first pregnancy) showed a modest association with increased preeclampsia risk ‌(Relative Risk [RR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.62; P < .001). ⁤Factors like⁤ obesity (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22; P = .048), Black race (RR, 0.95;​ 95% CI, 0.80-1.14; P = .63), and advanced maternal⁤ age (RR, 0.79; 95% CI,⁢ 0.65-0.96;⁢ P = .02) showed ⁣little to no association with increased risk​ in this specific subgroup.

The Rising Tide of Preeclampsia and the Need for ⁤innovation

The findings come ‌at a critical time, as rates of preeclampsia in ⁣the U.S. have doubled over the past 15 years, with⁣ no signs of ​slowing.Kara Boeldt, a preeclampsia survivor‍ and ⁢Founder and Executive⁤ Director of EndPreeclampsia.org, expressed concern‌ that the 2021 USPSTF guidelines have not curbed this alarming trend.

“The introduction of the USPSTF guidelines in 2021 didn’t‍ do⁤ anything to reverse course on ⁢the rise of preeclampsia,” Boeldt commented.‍ “This vital and eye-opening study highlights that we⁢ need new approaches that can predict‍ who’s truly at risk‍ for preeclampsia, ​which can be so hazardous for ‌moms and their babies. This is ‌why I am incredibly encouraged and excited by the innovation being ⁤led by companies ‍like‍ Mirvie, which can finally offer some pregnant women and their care teams a clear, personalized prediction of their preeclampsia risk with a simple‍ blood⁣ test during pregnancy.”

A Call for Clearer, Objective Risk Prediction

The study underscores a growing consensus that more precise⁢ and objective methods are⁤ needed to‌ identify ⁣individuals who ⁢will​ benefit most from preventive interventions.

“the findings of this critically important study confirm the need for​ clear, objective measures of preeclampsia risk​ prediction, to motivate preventive⁣ care,” ‌said Maneesh Jain, CEO and Co-Founder of Mirvie.

Mirvie’s innovative ⁤approach, exemplified by their Encompass™ ⁣platform, aims to provide this⁢ much-needed clarity. By leveraging advanced technology, companies like⁤ Mirvie are working to deliver personalized risk predictions, enabling‍ healthcare providers to intervene earlier and more effectively.

“With innovation like‍ Encompass™, we can now deliver preventive care to the right⁤ patients at the right time and impact rates

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Aspirin, Blood, Body Mass Index, cell, Chronic, Medicine, pregnancy, Research, RNA

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service