Prince Harry: UK Tabloid Court Battle “Not About Me

Prince Harry struck a ‍combative tone as he testified Wednesday in his lawsuit against ⁣the publisher of the⁢ Daily Mail and insisted that his latest legal battle with Associated Newspaper Ltd. was “in the public interest.”

Harry and six other prominent figures, including Elton John and actor ⁢Elizabeth Hurley, allege that the publisher invaded ⁢their privacy by engaging in a “clear, systematic and sustained use of unlawful facts gathering” for two decades, attorney⁣ David Sherborne said. The celebrities allege that the company illegally spied on them⁢ by hiring private investigators⁣ to hack their phones, bug their cars and access private records. ‍testimony⁤ from several private investigators, who have said they worked on ⁤behalf of Associated newspapers,⁢ is set to be used in⁢ the trial.

Associated Newspapers Ltd. has denied the allegations, called them preposterous and said the roughly 50 articles in question were reported⁢ with legitimate ‍sources that included close associates willing to inform on their famous friends.

Harry said in his 23-page witness statement that he was distressed and disturbed‍ by the intrusion into his early ⁤life by the Mail and its sister publication the Mail on⁣ Sunday, and that it made him “paranoid ⁤beyond belief.” Harry also alleged that ⁤the lives of “thousands of people” ‍were “invaded” by ⁢Associated “because of greed.”

“There ⁤is obviously a personal ⁣element to bringing this claim, motivated by truth, justice and accountability, but it is not just about me,” Harry said ⁣in a written statement ⁢unveiled as ‍he entered the witness box. Under the⁢ English civil ⁣court system, ⁣witnesses present written testimony, and after⁤ asserting that it’s the truth are immediately put under cross examination. “I am determined to hold Associated accountable, for‍ everyone’s sake … I believe it is in the public interest.”

A heated cross ⁤examination

Harry, dressed in a dark suit, held a small ⁢Bible in his right⁢ hand in London’s High Court and swore to “almighty⁣ God that the evidence I shall give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.” ⁢After the Duke of Sussex said he preferred to be called Prince Harry, he acknowledged that his 23-page ⁢statement was authentic and accurate.

Defense lawyer Antony White, in ⁤a calm ‍and ‍gentle tone, began to put questions to Harry to determine if ⁣the ‍sourcing of the articles, in fact, had come from royal correspondents wo

Prince Harry ‍Testifies in Phone Hacking Case Against ⁢Mirror Group Newspapers

Prince Harry appeared at London’s High ⁢Court on Wednesday, January 21, 2026, to testify in ‍his lawsuit against‍ Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN). He alleges his phone was illegally hacked by journalists working⁢ for MGN titles,including ⁣the Daily Mirror,the Sunday ⁣Mirror,and the People. This marks the second time Harry has testified in the case, making him the ⁣first member of the British Royal Family to do so.

Harry claims MGN journalists obtained ⁣private information through unlawful means, impacting his life⁤ and relationships.‍ He detailed instances where stories appeared in⁣ the press that he believes could only have been obtained through phone hacking. The Prince specifically cited 33 articles between ⁣1996 and 2010 as examples of information obtained illegally.

MGN admits to some unlawful information gathering practices at its titles between ‍1991 and 2011, but denies that hacking occurred on the scale alleged by Harry and other claimants. the publisher⁤ argues ⁢that the information came from legitimate sources.

The trial⁣ began in May⁢ 2024 and is expected to conclude in February 2026. A ruling is anticipated shortly thereafter. Similar claims have been brought against MGN by other high-profile figures, including actor Hugh Grant and Countess Elizabeth Wade.

This case is significant as it represents a continued effort to hold media organizations accountable for ‍alleged privacy violations. The ⁣outcome could set a precedent for future claims against ‍news outlets.