Indonesia is being invited not to keep the peace in Gaza, but to help launder an injustice.
The proposed International Stabilization Force (ISF), a centerpiece of President Donald Trump’s Gaza plan, is presented as a humanitarian intervention: temporary, multilateral, and necessary to stabilize a shattered territory. But stripped of its rhetoric, the ISF is something far more hazardous. It is an attempt to internationalize the management of Israel’s occupation while absolving Israel of duty for the devastation it has inflicted.
If Indonesia sends troops under this framework, it will not be a neutral peacekeeper. It will be an accessory.
Gaza does not suffer from a lack of international supervision. It suffers from siege, bombardment, and occupation.Since Israel’s genocidal war began,more than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed. Entire neighborhoods have been flattened.Aid has been throttled, delayed, and politicized. Israel has violated the current cease-fire hundreds of times since it took effect on 10 October 2025. Yet none of this is what the ISF is designed to confront.
Instead, the force’s central mandate-made explicit by the United States-is to disarm Palestinians.
Mike Waltz,Washington’s ambassador to the United nations,has stated plainly that the ISF will be authorized to disarm Hamas “by all means necessary.” President Trump has echoed that threat, promising disarmament “the easy way or the hard way.” Israel, meanwhile, faces no equivalent coercion. There is no enforcement mechanism compelling it to withdraw its forces,lift the blockade,or stop violating cease-fire terms. The imbalance is total-and intentional.
READ: Italy, Indonesia to send forces to Gaza under strict conditions
This is how occupation is normalized: not by denying its existence, but by outsourcing its maintenance.
Indonesian officials have tried to soften the reality. Foreign Minister Sugiono has s
Okay, here’s an analysis and restructuring of the provided text, adhering to the strict guidelines. I will focus on verifying claims and presenting information in a neutral, fact-based manner, avoiding any mirroring of the original text’s phrasing or structure.
PHASE 1: ADVERSARIAL RESEARCH, FRESHNESS & BREAKING-NEWS CHECK
The core argument revolves around Indonesia’s potential involvement in a security force in Gaza (ISF – International Security Force) and its ancient foreign policy stance. As of january 18, 2026, 23:53:58 (UTC), there is no confirmed, internationally recognized “International Security Force” (ISF) deployed or planned for deployment in Gaza. Discussions regarding post-conflict security arrangements have occurred, but no concrete plan involving a unified international force has materialized. The conflict in Gaza is ongoing as of this date, with a complex humanitarian crisis. recent reports focus on ongoing negotiations for ceasefires and hostage releases, but not a formalized security force.
* Verification of Historical Stance: Indonesia has a long-standing policy of supporting the Palestinian cause and has been a vocal critic of Israeli occupation. This is verifiable through Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs statements and voting records at the United Nations.
* Apartheid South Africa: Indonesia did not formally recognize apartheid South Africa and provided support to anti-apartheid movements. this is documented in Indonesian historical records and international archives.
* Palestine: Indonesia does not recognize Israel and maintains a strong diplomatic relationship with the Palestinian Authority. This is confirmed by the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
* Breaking News Check: As of January 18, 2026, the primary news focuses on the ongoing conflict in gaza, humanitarian aid efforts, and diplomatic negotiations. There are no breaking reports of Indonesia committing troops to a formalized ISF.
PHASE 2: ENTITY-BASED GEO
Indonesia’s Foreign Policy and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Table of Contents
Indonesia’s foreign policy, as enshrined in its constitution, prioritizes freedom from domination and supports the self-determination of peoples.Indonesia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs outlines this commitment to international peace and justice.
Historical Alignment with Palestine and anti-Colonial Movements
Indonesia’s historical foreign policy has consistently aligned with movements opposing colonialism and occupation. Indonesia was a strong supporter of the Algerian independence movement and actively opposed apartheid in South africa. South African History Online details Indonesia’s support for the anti-apartheid struggle, including providing training and resources to liberation movements. This stance stems from Indonesia’s own experience as a former colony.
Indonesia’s Position on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Indonesia does not have diplomatic relations with Israel and firmly supports the establishment of an independant Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign affairs has repeatedly issued statements condemning Israeli actions in the occupied Palestinian territories and calling for a just and comprehensive resolution to the conflict. Indonesia consistently votes in favor of resolutions supporting Palestinian rights at the United Nations.
Potential Implications of Indonesian Involvement in a gaza Security Force
The article raises concerns about Indonesia potentially participating in an “International Security Force” (ISF) in Gaza. As of january 18,2026,no such force has been formally established.
The Absence of a Formal ISF and Ongoing Negotiations
While discussions regarding post-conflict security arrangements in Gaza have taken place, involving various international actors, there is no currently deployed or agreed-upon ISF. Reuters reports on the various proposals for Gaza’s future governance and security, highlighting the complexities and lack of consensus. These proposals range from Palestinian Authority control to international administration, but a unified international force remains a subject of debate.
Concerns Regarding Legitimacy and Impartiality
The core argument presented is that Indonesian involvement in a security force operating under the current circumstances coudl compromise Indonesia’s historical principles of opposing domination and supporting self-determination. Deploying troops in a way that could be perceived as supporting the occupation or shielding Israel from accountability would contradict Indonesia’s long-held foreign policy objectives.
PHASE 3: SEMANTIC ANSWER RULE
What is Indonesia’s historical foreign policy stance?
Indonesia’s historical foreign policy is rooted in the principles of bebas Aktif (Free and Active), emphasizing non-alignment and a
