Sore Doubts About European Military Force
- Several countries are considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, but the head of the Association for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) doubts their credibility.
- Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Australia, and Belgium are among the countries considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine.
- However, the head of the OSCE, feridun Sinirlioglu, has expressed doubts about their credibility.
In Short
Table of Contents
Several countries are considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, but the head of the Association for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) doubts their credibility. The OSCE chief expressed skepticism about a larger military contribution from Western countries. One expert believes Europe lacks a strategy and that sending forces without American support is unrealistic. Instead, Europe should focus on providing Ukraine with massive military aid to deter Russia.
Denmark, Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Australia, and Belgium are among the countries considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine.
However, the head of the OSCE, feridun Sinirlioglu, has expressed doubts about their credibility.
Sinirlioglu reportedly conveyed his skepticism to Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide during the Security Conference in Munich in February.
The conversation was detailed in an internal summary.

According to the summary, Sinirlioglu did not beleive there would be a meaningful military contribution from any country or organization.
The Foreign Minister declined to comment further on the details of the conversation.
About the OSCE
- Also known as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
- A regional organization consisting of 57 member states.
- Member states include all European states,as well as the United States,Canada,and several central Asian and Caucasian states.
- The OSCE works on security policy, conflict prevention, human rights, and economic and environmental cooperation.
Source: Large Norwegian Lexicon
The conversation took place during the Munich Security Conference,amid concerns about European security and assistance to Ukraine.
“Little Ability or Will”
On March 17, a British prime Minister stated that more than 30 countries should be willing to contribute economically or militarily to Ukraine.
However,it is uncertain whether the OSCE chief shares this optimism.
Sinirlioglu reportedly told the Foreign Minister that many western countries that struck with great words have little ability or will in practice.
One expert stated that Europe lacks a strategy and questioned the feasibility of sending forces without American support.
Norway has stated that sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine is not currently relevant.

The expert suggested that Europe should instead focus on providing Ukraine with ample military aid to deter Russia.
Doubts Raised Over Proposed European Military Force for Ukraine

A proposal for a European military force to intervene in Ukraine is facing skepticism from experts who question its feasibility and strategic rationale.
Realism Questioned
One expert, a professor at the University of Oslo and a former secretary of state in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, sees little practical sense in the plan.
I see no realism in this program. Russia does not want a strength from NATO countries, Trump will hardly either. So what’s the point of launching it? The only possible explanation is that there is a way to get into the peace talks,
she said.
Recent meetings between U.S. and Ukrainian officials have indicated a willingness to begin negotiations for a lasting peace in Ukraine.
Former President Trump has previously stated that Europe should not participate in these negotiations.
Trump’s Stance Must be Considered
The expert believes Western nations have not adequately addressed key strategic questions regarding a potential force in Ukraine.
one critical issue is whether the force would consist solely of European soldiers, without a security guarantee from the United States. Former President Trump has reportedly ruled out such a guarantee.
We have to take the statement to Trump seriously. Given this, will Europe risk coming into battle with Russian forces in Ukraine? So far, you have not wanted to,
she said.
She emphasizes that a willingness to accept this risk is essential for any peacekeeping force.
Russia has warned the West that the deployment of peacekeeping forces would be tantamount to direct armed conflict.
Europe must also provide air power to secure the airspace over its land force.Then this can easily come in battle with Russian aircraft or have to shoot down Russian drones.Do you want that?
she asked.
Need for Domestic Forces
The size of the force is another significant consideration. The expert suggests a minimum of 30,000 soldiers, requiring a total of 90,000 personnel to account for rotations.
Where will these come from?
she asked.
European defense is already stretched thin, with placements in the Baltic and Romania.And each country’s own defense should now be built. We need new strengths at home and cannot dismiss them for Ukraine.
She concludes that the most viable option for Europe, without U.S. assistance,is to provide substantial military aid to Ukraine,regardless of whether the conflict continues or a peace agreement is reached.

European Nations Bolster Defenses Amid Ongoing conflict
European countries are increasing their defense capabilities as the conflict in Ukraine continues. Some nations are considering sending peacekeeping forces if needed.
Several European nations are focusing on strengthening their defense capabilities. France has indicated a willingness to send peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, should the need arise.
One analyst stated,
There is no point in ‘peacekeeping’ here. What is significant is that Ukraine is enabled to deter Russia from new attacks. Europe can send military advisers, and most preferably Ukraine should get nuclear weapons left to deter Russia himself, along with a conventional strength that is so strong that it can deter in the first hand.
When contacted for comment regarding the OSCE leader’s statements, a spokesperson for the organization responded:
We cannot comment on the capabilities and contributions of individual states to end the war, but as an organization we are ready to support efforts for a peaceful solution to the war in every way that can be useful.
Doubts and Debates: The Future of European Intervention in Ukraine
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has prompted discussions about international intervention, especially the potential deployment of peacekeeping forces. However,questions have arisen concerning the feasibility and strategic implications of these proposals. This article explores these complex issues, drawing on expert opinions and examining the challenges ahead.
Is a European Peacekeeping Force for Ukraine realistic?
The idea of a European military force in Ukraine
