Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Sore Doubts About European Military Force - News Directory 3

Sore Doubts About European Military Force

March 22, 2025 Catherine Williams World
News Context
At a glance
  • Several⁣ countries are considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, but the head of the Association for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) doubts their credibility.
  • Denmark, ⁤Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Australia, and Belgium are among the countries considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine.
  • However, the head of the OSCE, feridun Sinirlioglu, has ⁢expressed doubts about their credibility.
Original source: dagbladet.no

In Short

Table of Contents

    • In Short
    • About the OSCE
      • Related Article
        • Ukraine’s big mistake?
      • “Little Ability or Will”
  • Doubts Raised Over Proposed ⁤European Military Force for Ukraine
    • Realism Questioned
      • Related Article
    • Trump’s Stance Must be Considered
      • Related Article
    • Need for Domestic Forces
  • European Nations ‍Bolster Defenses Amid Ongoing conflict
  • Doubts and Debates: The Future of European Intervention in Ukraine
    • Is a European Peacekeeping Force for Ukraine realistic?

Several⁣ countries are considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, but the head of the Association for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) doubts their credibility. The OSCE chief expressed skepticism about a larger military⁣ contribution⁢ from Western countries. One expert believes Europe lacks a strategy and that sending forces without American support is ⁤unrealistic. Instead, Europe should focus on ⁢providing Ukraine with massive military aid to deter Russia.

Denmark, ⁤Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, Switzerland, Ireland, Australia, and Belgium are among the countries considering sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine.

However, the head of the OSCE, feridun Sinirlioglu, has ⁢expressed doubts about their credibility.

Sinirlioglu reportedly conveyed his skepticism to Foreign⁢ Minister Espen Barth ⁢Eide during the Security Conference in Munich in February.

The conversation⁣ was detailed in an internal summary.

Feridun Sinirlioglu
Feridun Sinirlioglu, Secretary General of the OSCE. Photo: Maxim Shemetov /⁢ Ap

According to the summary, Sinirlioglu did not beleive there would be a meaningful military contribution from any country or organization.

The Foreign Minister declined to⁤ comment ‍further on the details of ‍the conversation.

About the OSCE

  • Also known as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
  • A regional organization consisting⁤ of 57 member states.
  • Member states include all European states,as well as the United States,Canada,and several central Asian and Caucasian states.
  • The OSCE works on security policy, conflict prevention, human rights,⁣ and economic and environmental cooperation.

Source: Large Norwegian Lexicon

The conversation took place during the Munich Security Conference,amid concerns about European security and ‍assistance to Ukraine.

Related Article


Ukraine's big mistake?

Ukraine’s big mistake?


“Little Ability or Will”

On March 17, a British prime Minister stated that more than 30 countries should be willing to contribute economically or militarily to Ukraine.

However,it is ‍uncertain whether⁤ the OSCE chief shares this optimism.

Sinirlioglu reportedly told⁢ the Foreign Minister that many western ⁢countries that struck with great words have little ability⁢ or will in practice.

One expert stated that Europe lacks a‍ strategy ⁢and questioned the feasibility‍ of sending⁤ forces without ⁢American support.

Norway ⁣has stated that ⁣sending peacekeeping forces to Ukraine is not currently relevant.

Janne Haaland Matlary
Janne Haaland Matlary. Photo: NTB

The expert suggested that Europe should instead focus on providing Ukraine with ample military aid to deter Russia.

Doubts Raised Over Proposed ⁤European Military Force for Ukraine

Janne Haaland Matlary
Janne Haaland Matlary, defense expert. ⁣

A proposal for a European military force to intervene in Ukraine is facing skepticism from experts who question its feasibility and strategic rationale.

Realism Questioned

One expert, ‍a professor at the University of Oslo and a former secretary ⁣of state‍ in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, sees little practical sense in ⁢the plan.

I see no realism in this program. Russia does not want a strength from NATO⁣ countries, Trump will hardly either. So what’s the point of launching it? The only possible explanation is that there is a way to⁤ get into ⁣the peace talks, she said.

Recent meetings⁤ between U.S. and⁢ Ukrainian officials⁤ have indicated a ‍willingness⁤ to‍ begin negotiations for a lasting peace in Ukraine.

Former President Trump has previously stated that Europe should not participate in ⁤these negotiations.

Related Article

– Agree on a lot

Trump’s Stance Must be Considered

The expert believes Western nations have not adequately addressed key strategic questions regarding a potential force ⁣in⁢ Ukraine.

one critical issue is whether the ‍force would consist solely of European soldiers, without a security guarantee⁤ from the United States. Former President Trump has reportedly ruled out such a guarantee.

We have ⁣to take the statement to Trump ⁢seriously. ‍Given this, will Europe risk coming into battle with ‍Russian forces in ‍Ukraine? So far, you have not wanted to, she said.

She emphasizes that a willingness to accept this risk ⁤is essential for any peacekeeping⁣ force.

Russia has warned the West that the deployment of peacekeeping forces would be tantamount to direct armed conflict.

Europe must ⁢also provide air power to secure the airspace over its land force.Then this can easily come in ⁤battle with Russian aircraft or have to shoot down Russian drones.Do you want that? she asked.

Related Article

– ‍the devil is in the details

Need for Domestic Forces

The size of the force is another significant consideration. The expert suggests a minimum of 30,000 soldiers, requiring a total of 90,000 personnel to account for rotations.

Where will these ⁣come from? she asked.

European defense is already stretched thin, with placements in the ⁣Baltic and Romania.And each country’s own defense should now be built. We need new strengths at home and cannot dismiss them for Ukraine.

She concludes that the most viable option for Europe, without U.S. ⁢assistance,is to provide substantial military aid to⁤ Ukraine,regardless of whether the conflict continues or a peace agreement is reached.

Military Aid
The expert suggests that the most viable option for Europe, without U.S. assistance, ⁣is to provide substantial military ⁤aid to ukraine.

European Nations ‍Bolster Defenses Amid Ongoing conflict

European countries⁢ are increasing their defense capabilities as⁣ the conflict ⁣in Ukraine continues. Some nations are considering sending peacekeeping forces if needed.

March 22, 2025

French soldiers ‍during a military exercise
French soldiers during a military exercise earlier in March. Photo: Miguel Medina / AFP / NTB

Several European nations are focusing on strengthening their ⁣defense capabilities. France has indicated a willingness to send peacekeeping forces to Ukraine, should the need arise.

One analyst stated,

There is ⁢no point in ‘peacekeeping’ here. What‍ is significant is that Ukraine is enabled to deter Russia from new attacks. Europe can send military advisers, and most preferably Ukraine should get nuclear weapons left to deter Russia himself, along with a⁢ conventional strength that is so strong that it can deter in the first hand.

When contacted for comment regarding the OSCE leader’s statements, a spokesperson for the organization responded:

We cannot comment on⁣ the capabilities ⁤and contributions of individual states to end ⁤the war, but as an organization we are ready to support efforts for a peaceful solution to the war in every way that can be ⁣useful.

This is a developing story and will be updated as more facts becomes available.

Doubts and Debates: The Future of European Intervention in Ukraine

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has prompted discussions about international intervention, especially the potential deployment of peacekeeping forces. However,questions have arisen concerning the feasibility ⁣and strategic implications of these proposals. This article explores these complex issues, drawing on expert opinions and⁢ examining the challenges ahead.

Is a European Peacekeeping Force for Ukraine realistic?

The idea of a European military force‍ in⁢ Ukraine

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related reading

  • California Content Creators Block Ambulance for West Hollywood Photo Shoot
  • Taiwan Receives First US-Made F-16V Fighter Jets to Deter China

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

News Directory 3 catalogs US newspapers, news services, newsstands and digital news outlets across all 50 states. Browse local publishers by city, state, or topic, and follow current headlines linked back to their original sources.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.
For contact, advertising, copyright, issues email: office@newsdirectory3.com