Okay, here’s a breakdown of the text provided, extracting the key data about each featured piece of journalism:
1. ProPublica
* Title: (Implied – about cuts to federal health agencies)
* Authors: Brandon Roberts, Annie Waldman, and Pratheek Rebala
* Illustrations: Sam green
* Summary: ProPublica used data from the HHS employee directory to reveal the extent of cuts to the federal health workforce (over 20,500 workers) under the Trump management. The data was presented in striking visualizations.
* Commenter: Megan Molteni (science writer, STAT news) – Praises the data work and public service aspect.
2. The Washington post
* Title: (Implied – about a clause in federal research grant agreements)
* Authors: Carolyn Y. johnson and Joel Achenbach
* Summary: The article examined a clause added to federal research grant agreements by the Trump administration allowing for termination of grants that “no longer effectuate agency priorities.” It’s seen as a key part of the administration’s strategy for aligning research with its goals.
* Commenter: Anil Oza (general assignment reporter, STAT News) – Highlights the prescience of the piece, as the NIH is now focusing on aligning its portfolio with the administration’s priorities.
3. The New Yorker
* Title: (Implied – about Philadelphia’s Mütter Museum)
* Author: Rachel monroe
* Summary: The piece focuses on Philadelphia’s Mütter Museum,a medical history museum known for its unusual and sometimes disturbing exhibits.
* Commenter: (incomplete – the text cuts off mid-sentence)
Overall:
The text is a collection of short reviews/highlights of notable journalism pieces, likely from a “best of the year” or similar list. Each entry includes the publication, authors, a brief summary, and a quote from another journalist explaining why the piece was significant.
