The‌ Devastating‍ Reality of War: A Threat ​to Humanity

The daughters and sons of the people are aware of‍ the desire of the leaders of the ‌war to penetrate this ⁢mass holocaust in order⁢ to satisfy their lust for power and wealth only from the people ‌and to ‌reform⁢ the state. The majority of the people also strongly believe that‍ the poles ‌of the war have reached the‍ edge of no return.

They⁢ cling‌ to an inevitable fate: either victory or suicide. There is ‌no way for either to leave the current impasse ⁢except ‍by destroying the other ⁢or destroying yourself. A massive loss dominates the horizon.‍ Both refuse⁣ to negotiate as a deal that ends with the loss of the spoils‌ of ⁢power and wealth.

The Failure of the State to Protect its Citizens

The destructive armed conflict based on‌ the armed ‍forces ‌and their militias created⁤ to ‍stop the movement of the⁣ masses has not only failed to ⁤protect its citizens or bring perpetrators⁣ of ​brutal crimes to account ⁢and punish them.‍ Rather, it is responsible for -⁤ and even ⁣participates in ⁢- ⁢horrific acts of violence against international humanitarian law and human rights.

The ⁢destruction of ‌civilian institutions such as hospitals, universities, and schools, ​as well as preventing relief from reaching those who suffer in the furnace of war, is a stark ‍reality. The state is the creator of the militia, its incubator⁤ and⁤ breeder. Despite this overwhelming fact,‍ no official dared ‍to‍ acknowledge it ‍publicly or apologize for it, let alone criticize its ⁤part in its upbringing.

The International Community’s Role⁣ in Protecting ‍Civilians

Many UN ⁣bodies ‍and non-governmental organizations have been busy in ⁣informal⁤ dialogues in Geneva and New York on the margins of⁣ the UN General Assembly and‍ far from it since that date,‌ with the⁣ principle of protecting​ the ‌population. However, the gap is still wide and deep between what is hoped for and what is practiced.

Like the majority of countries ‌involved – as in our case⁢ -‌ in the⁣ quagmire of state⁢ incompetence or its involvement in violent crimes against the people, our administration -​ the semi-government – refuses to admit to committing​ obvious mistakes in order to protect its people from war crimes of various‌ forms through preventive measures.

The Root of the Crisis: Improvisational Approach to Governance

The root of ​the crisis ⁣lies in the long-term administration of ⁢the state using an improvisational approach outside the science and art of politics. Did the rescue system establish a⁣ prosperous period of peace,⁤ or did​ the people enjoy the blessing of peace with it?

While voices in favor of the war, ‍trembling with failure,⁢ arise, holding‍ external parties responsible for igniting and fueling the fire of war, they reject any ‌external initiatives that would extinguish the fire. Both‍ cases constitute, according to the​ logic of the failed quasi-state, external intervention that violates national sovereignty.

The Need ​for a New Approach to Conflict Resolution

The ⁣international theater offers open⁣ presentations regarding the ⁤success ‍of coordinated ⁣international action ​in ‍protecting people and their economic⁤ and service institutions and ‌ensuring their democratic pathways ⁣without orders or conditions. However, our leadership (quasi-state) does not want this transition, ⁢but rather ​fears its introduction.

The two extremes of⁢ the fighting are⁢ betting on winning the war by prolonging it, completely ignoring the tragedy of‍ generations whose future⁤ is‍ scattered.⁢ Both realize their inability to achieve military superiority which would enable one of them to have a decisive victory.

Therefore, their​ tactics aim to avoid falling below the equilibrium step line. These ⁤tactics​ often​ involve protecting⁢ the stock ⁤of a⁣ military arsenal, deploying⁤ troops over a wide geographic area, and relying on an external backer‌ with military capabilities or political influence, or perhaps both.

Victory in war is not gained​ by the number of troops sent, the casualties inflicted on the other ​party, or the ⁢stock of the quantity and ⁢quality of weapons, but rather by the gains made on the ground for the benefit of the ⁤people and the state.