/data/photo/2024/06/09/66658b5bbcaad.jpeg)
JAKARTA – Indonesian comedian Sule is publicly voicing his frustration with his former brother-in-law, Teddy Pardiyana, over ongoing financial requests related to their shared son, Bintang. The dispute, which has resurfaced recently with a new legal challenge, centers on both child support and inheritance claims stemming from the estate of Sule’s late wife, Lina Jubaedah.
Sule, whose full name is Entis Sutisna, has made it clear he believes the financial responsibility for Bintang’s upbringing rests solely with Pardiyana. He expressed dismay that Pardiyana repeatedly approaches his other children – Rizky Febian, Putri Delina, Rizwan Fadillah, and Ferdinand Adriansyah Sutisna – seeking financial assistance. While acknowledging he hasn’t forbidden his children from helping their half-sibling, Sule firmly believes it’s not their obligation.
“I don’t ever forbid them from giving something to their brother,” Sule stated, as reported by Kompas.com. “But I regret it if their kindness is misinterpreted, portrayed as if they can live comfortably while Bintang cannot.”
Sule questioned Pardiyana’s work ethic, asking, “He is still healthy, fit, and can cook, why isn’t he working to support his child?” He emphasized that his own children should not be burdened with supporting another family member. “In my opinion, my children have no obligation to finance their stepbrother. Let him work,” Sule asserted.
The comedian expressed gratitude for his children’s willingness to help, but believes Pardiyana should be appreciative of that support rather than continuing to make demands. “It’s already a blessing that they’ve helped,” Sule said. He contrasted this with his own experience of financially supporting all five of his children and providing them with a comfortable life.
“It’s shameful for a man to not be able to take care of one child. I manage five children,” Sule stated, highlighting what he sees as a disparity in responsibility. He directly challenged Pardiyana to find employment instead of relying on others, stating, “Don’t talk about not being able to afford it. ‘Oh, because Sule has a lot of money’ – it’s the result of my work, so you work too.”
The current dispute extends beyond child support to include a renewed legal battle over the inheritance of Lina Jubaedah. On December 1, 2025, Pardiyana filed a request with the Bandung Religious Court to determine the legal status of Bintang as an heir. The court request named Sule’s children – Rizky Febian, Putri Delina, Rizwan Fadillah, Ferdinand Adriansyah Sutisna – and Lina Jubaedah’s mother, Utisah, as respondents.
Pardiyana’s legal counsel, Wati Trisnawati, explained the petition was filed after statements questioning Bintang’s status as a legitimate heir. However, Trisnawati clarified that the intention isn’t to claim a portion of the inheritance, but rather to clarify the legal standing of all heirs, a matter that has been ongoing for six years.
As of , Sule’s side had not yet responded to the request for mediation. Trisnawati indicated that if no response is received within the 30-day period scheduled by the Bandung Religious Court, the legal process will continue as planned. She emphasized that the petitioner, Pardiyana, is obligated to be present regardless of Sule’s participation.
Sule, however, has taken a firm stance, stating that he has no further involvement in the matter, but insists that the rights of his own children be addressed before any consideration is given to Bintang’s inheritance claim. He also referenced the circumstances surrounding his separation from Lina, noting that she did not receive a traditional ‘gana gini’ (marital property division) but rather a ‘gift’ which she subsequently willed to Putri Delina.
“If there is a portion of the inheritance for Bintang, that’s fine. But when we talk about inheritance, the assets should be the assets of both parents together,” Sule explained. “However, the house and shop were given to her by me. Teddy doesn’t have any assets of his own.”
The renewed legal challenge has reportedly sparked online harassment directed at Pardiyana, a situation Trisnawati acknowledged, stating that her client is accustomed to the psychological pressure. The situation highlights a recurring pattern of inheritance disputes within Indonesian celebrity families, raising questions about estate planning and the complexities of blended families.
Sule’s public condemnation of Pardiyana’s repeated requests for financial assistance and his insistence on personal responsibility mark a significant escalation in the ongoing family dispute. The outcome of the legal proceedings at the Bandung Religious Court will likely set a precedent for similar cases involving inheritance and parental obligations in Indonesia.
