A judge granted the definitive suspension in the amparo trial 1754/2023, against the extinction of the 13 trusts of the Power of attorney of the Federation, which accumulates 15,800 million pesos.
The District Judge in Administrative Matters of Mexico City, Elizabeth Trejo, granted the suspension to the National Association of Circuit Magistrates and District Judges of the Judicial Branch of the Federation (JUFED), whose effects will subsist until the main point of the trial is resolved.
The JUFED explained that the judges and public servants of the PJF The extinction of said trusts affects acquired rights provided for in the General Working Conditions.
He added that the funds, remaining resources, products and uses derived from the 13 trusts should not be extinguished or delivered to the Treasury of the Federation, corresponding to the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, the Federal Judiciary Council and the Electoral Court. of the Judicial Branch of the Federation, involved in the claimed legislative decree.
“The above, by virtue of the fact that the suspension was now definitively granted with respect to the claimed standard so that things remain in the state they are in.”
“But with general effects, because it impacts all the personnel of the Federal Judiciary, which implies that the funds from said trusts will continue to be applied to fulfill their object and purposes originally determined therein, whose final destination will be determined in a constitutional ruling.”detailed the Association.
The judge’s definitive suspension indicates that it is granted, in terms of what is stated in the resolution and for the specified purposes.
“The Thirteenth Collegiate Court on Administrative Matters of the First Circuit and the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation be made aware of this determination, in the terms indicated in the last recital,” the definitive suspension states.
It abounds that the definitive suspension of the claimed acts, with which it is intended that the fiduciary institutions refrain from carrying out the extinction or termination of the trustsin order to continue to exercise all the rights of the trustees and beneficiaries thereof.
“By its nature, it is a positive act, so it does allow its suspension. The requirement that the suspension be requested by the aggrieved party implies the demonstration of its interest in that presumptive manner, that is, that it has a protected right,” he says.
*Stay up to date with the news, join our WhatsApp channel
OF
Themes
Trusts Judicial Power protections
Read Also
Get the latest news in your email
Everything you need to know to start your day
Registering implies accepting the Terms and Conditions
