Home » Tech » Trump & Academic Publishing: Reinventing for a Post-Truth Era

Trump & Academic Publishing: Reinventing for a Post-Truth Era

Facing data removal and restrictions, academic publishing must adapt. ⁤The article details how efforts‍ to⁢ preserve scientific ⁣data are ⁤now underway as the Trump governance removes or downgrades data on climate change ‍and other key research areas. Groups are ⁢launching preservation efforts like the “PANGAEA Data⁣ Rescue Initiative 2025”, while concerns grow ​about the reliability of⁣ key resources like ​PubMed.Actions by government officials to control research publication are threatening independent scientific‍ inquiry. Smaller open‌ access publishers ⁢and diamond open access journals emerge ​as potential⁢ platforms for affected researchers. News Directory ​3 provides⁣ deep insights into these developments within the post-truth era. Discover⁣ what’s next ​for academic publishing in the​ face of these challenges.

Trump Management Data Removal Sparks Preservation Efforts

efforts to safeguard scientific data are underway as a response⁣ to the Trump administration’s actions to remove or downgrade mentions of the climate crisis on U.S.government websites and delete key datasets. Environmental and science groups are suing the U.S. government for removing public facts.

The Internet Archive launched “Democracy’s Library,” compiling over 700 collections from more than 50 government organizations. European⁣ groups are also initiating projects to preserve data. Pag, a data ⁤publisher for earth and environmental science hosted by the University of⁣ Bremen in Germany,⁤ announced the “PANGAEA Data Rescue Initiative 2025.”

The PANGAEA initiative aims to preserve ‌critical data threatened by budget cuts ‍to federal science agencies like the National Science Foundation, NOAA, and NASA, specifically targeting climate research, environmental monitoring, and public health data programs. The ⁢initiative follows FAIR data principles,ensuring findability,accessibility,interoperability,and reusability.

The Knowledge Commons is seeking funding from the Trust in American Institutions Challenge to​ back up vital research on ⁢a larger scale.Their⁣ proposal includes using Pretty Good Privacy encryption to preserve copyrighted material, ensuring it remains inaccessible until copyright expires.

Concerns about the reliability of PubMed,a key ⁤resource for accessing medical papers,have also surfaced.Following a temporary⁤ outage,the‌ German Library of Medicine,ZB Med,launched an effort to create an open-source global literature infrastructure,aiming for a federated safety net supported by an international network.

Hilda Bastian noted⁢ that⁤ convincing customary publishers to⁤ contribute metadata remains a challenge. ZB MED has begun negotiations with publishers, and several open access publishers have expressed ‍willingness to submit their metadata to this project.

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. threatened to ban government‍ scientists from publishing in top medical journals, accusing them of corruption and pharmaceutical company ‌control. Kennedy outlined plans to launch government-run journals‍ publishing “approved” research.Scientists warn that Trump’s “Gold Standard Science” initiative could harm‌ American science.

These moves to restrict access to knowledge highlight the need to reinvent ⁢academic publishing. Smaller open access publishers and diamond open access journals, supported by self-reliant foundations, may serve as platforms for researchers affected ‌by the Trump administration’s policies.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.