Trump Ukraine Peace Deal Alaskan Peak – International Press

Reviews of the international press released until Saturday morning agree that it did not produce any results between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, a historic importance by the US President Alaska Summit.

A New York Times according to his analysis Paradoxically, while in “more normal times” it would be desperate for two atomic powers not to agree on the closing of a brutal war that had been three years ago, Ukraine and US allies could breathe because Trump and Putin had not reached an agreement, as many were afraid of a spectacular agreement. areas. The sheet is a in another article It draws attention to the fact that content inefficiency has been counterpointed by a friendly behavior against the Russian president accused by the International Criminal Tribunal, accused

“My relationship with President Putin, Vladimir, was always fantastic.”

According to the analysis, Putin, who returns friendly gestures, is the one who can actually record the meeting as a diplomatic victory as it has lifted its international isolation since February 2022.

Analysis of Washington Post point out It is telling that after a friendly reception, the summit ended earlier than planned, and the two leaders did not answer the journalist questions on the spot. The sheet is a white home reporter according to Despite the public boast, Trump himself could not be satisfied with the ineffectiveness, and his body language and the unusual lean statement from him.

Fox News as most positively as possible to evaluate he highlighted itthat the Trump government can try to encourage Russia to peace with business opportunities, and business considerations can drive the White House to encourage land exchange.

To evaluate the BBC according to While Trump’s self -image is one of his strengths to make peace and hit the agreement, he did not succeed in making any (supposed) virtue at the Alaska Summit. This failure can hurt the President’s international prestige, especially before the meeting gave 25 percent not to reach any agreement.

The European edition of Politico article He called the meeting “Putin’s triumph” because the war aggressor on American land was not received by a friend, but as a friend, and the meeting returned it to acceptable actors of international diplomacy. According to the analysis, it is also a positive development for Russia that the Ukrainian directing was served as if it were only on the two atomic powers – this narrative is otherwise coincided with the serving of Russian state media.