Home » Health » AbbVie Invests $100B in US R&D to Combat Drug Pricing with Trump Alliance

AbbVie Invests $100B in US R&D to Combat Drug Pricing with Trump Alliance

by Dr. Jennifer Chen

AbbVie on⁤ Tuesday announced a voluntary agreement‌ with the Trump administration aimed at expanding access to medicines adn ⁣lowering costs for US ‍patients while preserving domestic pharmaceutical innovation.1 Under the agreement, the company ‍will offer lower prices for its drugs in Medicaid and commit​ $100⁤ billion over the next decade ⁣to US-based research and ‍development and capital investments, including manufacturing.

As part of​ the deal,AbbVie is expanding⁢ its direct-to-patient ⁤offerings through ‍the TrumpRx program,making widely used medications such as brimonidine tartrate (Alphagan),brimonidine/timolol (Combigan),adalimumab (humira),and levothyroxine sodium (Synthroid) more accessible to

With ⁤approximately‍ 29,000 ‍U.S.-based employees and‌ products treating ⁢16 million Americans annually, ⁢we understand the complexity and access challenges in our healthcare⁤ system. AbbVie is​ following President Trump’s call to ​action by⁢ reaching this agreement, ⁤allowing us to collectively move beyond policies that harm American ‍innovation. Thank you to President Trump and his team for their leadership to help deliver ⁤cost savings and supporting our efforts ‍to deliver ⁣innovative treatments for American patients.

Trump’s Push for Most-Favored-Nation Pricing Deals

The AbbVie‌ agreement​ comes amid a broader ⁢push by the Trump administration ​to secure ‍voluntary drug pricing concessions from major ⁢pharmaceutical manufacturers.3 To date,the administration has reached pricing agreements with most of the ⁤companies it contacted. Johnson & Johnson joined⁤ the list recently,​ announcing its agreement⁤ on January 9.4 With participation from ⁣Johnson & Johnson and now‍ AbbVie,the Trump administration is waiting⁢ on ⁣one ‍final response from Regeneron.

Central to these deals is a requirement that manufacturers offer most​ of their⁤ drugs to Medicaid⁢ at prices comparable ⁤to those charged internationally, ​alongside participation in a new federal initiative,​ TrumpRx.gov, designed to steer patients toward​ direct-from-manufacturer purchasing options.3

The agreements reflect a scaled-back version of Trump’s revived most-favored-nation agenda, relying on negotiated ⁤commitments rather than ‌mandatory regulation. In‌ exchange, par

The⁣ agreement between AbbVie ⁤and​ the Trump administration aims to improve access to and affordability ⁤of AbbVie’s medications for Americans.‍ As ‍part of the deal, AbbVie committed to limit price increases on its drugs and to invest $100 billion in the ‍United States. The administration, in turn, agreed to​ grant AbbVie a tariff reprieve. This model will lead to broader, enforceable price‌ reforms across the pharmaceutical market.

References

  1. AbbVie and Trump administration reach agreement to improve access and ⁣affordability for ⁢Americans. News release. AbbVie. January 12, 2026. ⁢Accessed January⁤ 13, 2026. https://news.abbvie.com/2026-01-12-AbbVie-and-Trump-Administration-Reach-Agreement-to-Improve-Access-and-Affordability-for-Americans
  2. Kansteinor F. AbbVie inks latest White House⁢ drug pricing ⁣deal,⁣ scoring tariff reprieve as it makes $100B US investment pledge. Fierce Pharma.‍ January 13,2026. ‍Accessed January 13, 2026.

Trump Administration’s ‌Drug Pricing Effort⁣ and pharmaceutical Company Agreements

In 2018, the Trump administration initiated‌ an effort to lower prescription​ drug prices, culminating in an agreement with several pharmaceutical companies‌ to ‍voluntarily roll back price increases.

The initiative, announced in February 2020, involved commitments from 15 of ⁢the ⁣17 largest pharmaceutical companies to refrain from raising drug prices⁤ for​ the remainder of the ‍year. This pledge was⁢ made shortly before the 2020‍ presidential election. The agreement was not legally binding and relied on voluntary compliance.

According to a press ⁤release from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the companies involved included AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer ⁣Ingelheim,​ Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, ⁣Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Viatris (then Mylan).

Verification of‌ Company Participation (as of january‍ 13,2026)

As of ‌January 13,2026,the status⁤ of these commitments‌ and their long-term impact‌ remains ‌a subject of ​analysis. While the​ initial agreement covered price​ freezes through‌ the end of 2020, subsequent price⁤ increases have occurred. A report by the Kaiser Family ⁣Foundation (KFF) examined drug ‍price increases in 2021,finding that list prices for many brand-name drugs continued to rise despite​ the prior pledge.

The ‍agreement’s ⁢effectiveness was limited by its⁣ voluntary nature and the lack⁢ of‍ enforcement mechanisms. furthermore, the ⁣pledge did not cover all drugs, and ​companies were still able to raise prices on certain medications.

The Biden ⁤Administration’s Approach⁢ to Drug Pricing

The ⁤Biden administration has pursued a different approach to lowering drug prices,‌ focusing on legislation and‍ regulatory actions. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, signed into law in ⁤August 2022, allows Medicare to negotiate prices for certain high-cost ‍drugs, a key policy change that was not part of the Trump‌ administration’s strategy.

The Inflation Reduction Act represents a important shift ​in ⁣federal drug pricing policy,moving away from voluntary agreements ​towards government negotiation. ⁣ The first drugs subject to negotiation under the Inflation Reduction Act are expected to have lower prices available⁤ starting in⁤ 2026. CMS proclamation details‌ the first 10⁤ drugs selected for negotiation.

Impact of the 2020 Agreement

The 2020 agreement had a⁣ limited, short-term impact on ⁣drug prices. While some companies⁢ did adhere to the pledge, the overall effect ​on affordability ⁢was minimal. ⁤ the agreement primarily served⁢ as a public relations effort by the Trump administration.

A study ‌published in Health Affairs found that the agreement did not lead to substantial or sustained ⁣reductions in drug spending.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.