Home » Tech » AI Chatbots Sway Voters Better Than Political Ads

AI Chatbots Sway Voters Better Than Political Ads

by Lisa Park - Tech Editor

“`html

AI Chatbots⁣ and Political Persuasion: A Deep Dive

New⁢ research reveals the persuasive power⁢ of large language models (LLMs) in political discourse, alongside ⁢concerning trends ‌in​ the accuracy of AI-generated political⁢ statements.


The Accuracy Gap:‍ Right-Leaning Bots Spread More ‌Misinformation

A study ​published in Nature ⁤ found that AI ⁢chatbots used in political discussions frequently ​generated inaccurate claims.‍ Notably, chatbots advocating for right-leaning candidates were considerably more likely to make false statements then those supporting left-leaning ​candidates. Researchers ⁣analyzed chatbot interactions across the United States, the ⁤United Kingdom, and Canada.

According to David Costello, a researcher involved in the⁢ study, this​ disparity⁢ reflects existing patterns in‌ political interaction.Studies of ​partisan social ‌media posts have shown that “political communication that comes from the right, which⁢ tends to be less accurate,” ⁢is often reproduced by LLMs, ⁣which are trained on massive⁢ datasets of human-written text. The ⁤models ‌essentially mirror the biases and inaccuracies present in their⁤ training data.

The Power of ⁣Persuasion: Facts and Evidence Drive Influence

A separate study, published ‌in Science, investigated the factors that⁤ make LLMs so persuasive.‌ Researchers deployed 19 LLMs to interact with nearly 77,000 participants ​in the UK ‌on over 700 political issues. They varied factors like ⁤computational ⁤power, training techniques, ​and rhetorical strategies to determine what drove persuasive ‍outcomes. The study in Science revealed that the most ‍effective approach was to instruct the models to support their arguments with facts and evidence,and then to ⁣further train them using examples of persuasive conversations.

The most persuasive model demonstrably shifted participants’ opinions, moving those who initially disagreed with ⁤a political statement an ⁢average of 26.1 percentage points toward agreement. “These are really large treatment effects,” stated Kobi⁢ Hackenburg, a research scientist⁢ at the UK AI Security⁣ Institute, who contributed to the project.

Why ​LLMs Are More Persuasive ⁣Than customary Ads

According to ⁢Gordon Pennycook, a psychologist at cornell ‌University who worked on the Nature study, “One conversation with an ​LLM has a pretty meaningful affect on salient election choices.” LLMs surpass the ⁤effectiveness of traditional political advertisements because they generate details ⁣in real-time and strategically tailor their arguments to the individual user. This dynamic interaction allows for a​ more ​personalized and potentially‌ more impactful persuasive ⁤experiance.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.