Browns Face Difficult Decision on Defensive Coordinator Jim Schwartz
BEREA, Ohio — The Cleveland Browns are at a crossroads regarding the future of defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz, navigating a delicate balance between organizational rights and what many consider the “right thing to do,” according to multiple reports. The situation stems from Schwartz’s reported displeasure after not being selected as the team’s head coach, a position ultimately filled by Todd Monken.
Legally, the Browns are within their rights to compel Schwartz to honor his contract or pursue retirement, a point emphasized by several sources. However, a growing chorus of voices, including those within the NFL, suggest a more amicable resolution – allowing Schwartz to pursue other opportunities – would be beneficial for all parties involved.
The Browns previously took a similar approach with offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan, releasing him from his contract under a prior regime. Jason Lloyd of The Athletic argues that extending the same courtesy to Schwartz is warranted, particularly given the potential for a strained working relationship if he is forced to return.
The situation is complicated by Schwartz’s emotional response to being passed over for the head coaching role. At 59, he may have viewed this as his final opportunity, and his frustration is understandable, even if some believe it to be an overreaction. Reports indicate Schwartz expressed his unhappiness to individuals within the Browns organization, suggesting he may not return even under contract.
While Schwartz interviewed for the head coaching position with the Baltimore Ravens, he hasn’t been a prominent candidate in recent coaching searches. Despite this, he has built an excellent defense in Cleveland and is highly regarded as a defensive mind.
The dynamic between Schwartz and Monken is a key factor in the Browns’ decision-making process. Monken, in his introductory press conference, made it clear he didn’t specifically hire Schwartz, stating, “I didn’t take this job because of Jim Schwartz.” This bluntness, while demonstrating directness, may have further damaged the relationship.
The Browns are wary of repeating past experiences with internal coaching conflicts, having enjoyed six years of stability under the previous head coach. A prolonged and contentious situation with Schwartz could disrupt that stability.
According to Cleveland.com insider Mary Kay Cabot, the Browns have presented Schwartz with two options: retire or return as defensive coordinator. The team reportedly does not intend to release him from his contract, limiting his options.
While the Browns could legally enforce the contract, potentially forcing Schwartz to fulfill his obligations, some argue this approach could be counterproductive. Players like David Njoku and Myles Garrett have previously requested trades and were denied, but Schwartz’s situation is different. He has the financial security to retire if he chooses, a leverage point the Browns acknowledge.
Lloyd suggests that if the Browns genuinely value Schwartz’s contributions, they should demonstrate it by allowing him to pursue other opportunities. “If the Browns truly admire and respect Schwartz as much as they claim, they can prove it by doing the right thing and letting him out of his contract,” he wrote. The situation remains fluid, with the Browns and Schwartz facing a critical decision that will shape the future of the team’s defense and potentially impact their relationships with other coaches.
