Israel’s Nuclear Theft
- Allegations have surfaced suggesting Israel pursued nuclear weapons by any means necessary, including possibly stealing materials from the United States and violating international agreements.
- Victor Gilinsky and Leonard Weiss, members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS), contend that the series, while informative, only scratches the surface of what is known...
- A central figure in the TV series is benjamin blumberg, the former head of Lakam, Israel's scientific intelligence agency responsible for its nuclear program.
Israel’s Nuclear Program: Allegations of Deception and U.S. Complicity
Allegations have surfaced suggesting Israel pursued nuclear weapons by any means necessary, including possibly stealing materials from the United States and violating international agreements. These claims are fueled, in part, by an Israeli TV series, ‘The atom and Me,’ which explores the nation’s path to acquiring nuclear capabilities.
Victor Gilinsky and Leonard Weiss, members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS), contend that the series, while informative, only scratches the surface of what is known about Israel’s nuclear arsenal.They suggest the program understates the extent of existing knowledge on the subject.
Benjamin Blumberg’s Revelations
A central figure in the TV series is benjamin blumberg, the former head of Lakam, Israel’s scientific intelligence agency responsible for its nuclear program. Interviews with Blumberg, conducted before his death in 2018, form a common thread throughout the episodes. Blumberg,reportedly in poor health at the time of the interviews,stipulated that they could only be broadcast posthumously.
According to the series, some Israeli nuclear missions were so clandestine that even Mossad, the agency responsible for foreign intelligence gathering and covert operations, was unaware of them.
U.S. Connections and Alleged Cover-Ups
The TV series highlights events directly involving the united States. One such event is the alleged theft of Uranium-235 from the Numec facility in Pennsylvania during the 1980s. The series implicates Israeli spies, arms dealers, and Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan in the operation.
Furthermore, the series revisits the controversial 1979 nuclear test in the South African sea, which is believed to be an initial fission stage for thermonuclear weapons advancement. This test allegedly violated the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty, to which Israel is a signatory.
U.S. Policy and Israeli Nuclear Ambiguity
The series raises questions about the extent of U.S.awareness and tolerance of Israel’s nuclear program. According to the series, since John F.kennedy’s presidency, no U.S. president has actively sought to control Israel’s nuclear ambitions. Lyndon B. Johnson, Kennedy’s successor, is portrayed as having actively shielded Israel’s nuclear efforts, including allegedly covering up Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty during the Six-Day War in 1967.
The alleged theft of nuclear material from Numec never resulted in any charges. In 1976, the Attorney General reportedly considered charging U.S. officials at the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) for failing to report the theft, but no action was taken.President Jimmy Carter, and subsequent presidents, also reportedly refrained from taking action regarding the 1979 nuclear test.
Victor Gilinsky, a former AEC Commissioner, stated, “U.S. attachment to Israeli nuclear weapons does not escape international attention, and real hypocrisy has damaged U.S. nonproliferation policies.”
Gilinsky added that the U.S. government’s official stance remains one of ignorance regarding Israeli nuclear weapons. He claims this policy is enforced by a Federal Secret Bulletin that threatens disciplinary action against any U.S. official who openly acknowledges Israel’s nuclear capabilities.
Israeli Displays of Nuclear Deterrence
Despite international ambiguity, Israel has, at times, appeared to openly allude to its nuclear capabilities. For example,in 2016,Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,while receiving a German-supplied submarine,the Rahav,implied its nuclear capabilities.
According to reports,the submarine is considered capable of launching nuclear weapons. Netanyahu stated, ”Above everything, our submarine fleet acted as a prevention for our enemies. They need to know that Israel can attack,with great force,anyone who tries to hurt him.”
Meir Doron, a journalist specializing in Israeli security matters, stated in ‘The Atom and Me’ that following the 1979 nuclear test, key figures in Israel’s nuclear program, including Blumberg and Shimon Peres, felt secure in their achievements.
Violations of International Agreements
While Israel has not signed the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), it did ratify the 1963 Limited Test ban Treaty, which prohibits nuclear explosions in the atmosphere or ocean.
The 1979 nuclear test potentially triggered the Glenn Amendment to the Arms Export Control Act, which mandates sanctions against any non-NPT nation detonating a nuclear device after 1977. Despite U.S. intelligence agencies concluding that Israel was responsible for the September 22,1979,explosion,President Carter reportedly avoided imposing sanctions to protect ongoing Middle East policy initiatives.
The White House reportedly sought scientific opinions to downplay the event, while together suppressing Navy reports supporting the satellite data. Carter himself acknowledged in his diary his belief that Israel conducted a nuclear test.
Leonard Weiss, a former aide to Senator Glenn, stated that the Glenn Amendment allows the president to postpone sanctions based on national security or withdraw them with congressional approval, but “the law does not allow the President to ignore it.However, that is what they have done.”
Implications for U.S. Policy and Iran
The U.S. government’s handling of Israel’s nuclear program has implications for discussions surrounding Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The perceived double standard hinders open debate and the ability to honestly assess the nature and purpose of Israeli nuclear weapons, according to analysts.
What may have begun as a deterrent against another Holocaust has potentially evolved into a more assertive instrument of Israeli foreign policy.
The U.S. government’s silence on the issue has also discouraged press scrutiny. The last instance of a White House correspondent directly questioning the president about Israeli nuclear weapons occurred in 2009 when Helen Thomas asked President Obama about nuclear weapons in the Middle East.Obama declined to speculate.
A 2018 report in the New Yorker revealed that a U.S. President signed a secret letter to Israel promising not to disturb Israel’s nuclear weapons program or acknowledge its existence.
The series ‘the Atom and Me’ concludes by highlighting Israel’s unwavering determination to prioritize its perceived best interests above all other considerations.
Benjamin Blumberg, in a conversation, addressed Israel’s close relationship with South Africa during the Apartheid era, a relationship that provided Israel with uranium for its Dimona reactor and permission to conduct nuclear tests. When questioned about supporting a racist regime, Blumberg responded, ”Everything is true. But I don’t care. I want the best for Israel.”
Israel’s Nuclear Program: A Q&A on Allegations and US Involvement
The existence and advancement of Israel’s nuclear program remain a complex and often secretive topic. This article dives into the allegations surrounding its acquisition, the role of the United States, and the implications for international non-proliferation efforts.We’ll explore the insights derived from the Israeli TV series “The Atom and Me” and other reports.
What are the main allegations surrounding Israel’s nuclear program?
The primary allegations against israel’s nuclear program, as highlighted by the Israeli TV series and other reports, include:
- Acquisition by any means necessary: Concerns that israel pursued nuclear capabilities using various clandestine methods.
- Theft of nuclear material: Allegations of stealing Uranium-235 from the United States, specifically from the NUMEC facility in Pennsylvania.
- Violation of International Agreements: Suspicions of violating the Limited Test Ban Treaty through a potential nuclear test in 1979.
- Ambiguity and Deception: Maintaining a policy of “nuclear ambiguity,” neither confirming nor denying the existence of its nuclear weapons.
What is the significance of the TV series “The Atom and Me?”
The TV series “The Atom and Me” has been instrumental in bringing these allegations to a wider audience.It features interviews with key figures from Israel’s nuclear program, including Benjamin Blumberg, the former head of Lakam (Israel’s scientific intelligence agency). The series attempts to provide insights into how Israel developed its nuclear program, and the actions taken by key personnel.
Who was benjamin Blumberg, and what role did he play?
Benjamin Blumberg was the head of Lakam, the critical scientific intelligence agency responsible for Israel’s nuclear program. His posthumously broadcast interviews in “The Atom and Me” provide a deep dive into the program’s secretive operations. He provided crucial insights into the program’s origins and the lengths Israel went to achieve its nuclear goals.
How did Israel perhaps violate international agreements?
Israel ratified the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty, which prohibits nuclear explosions in the atmosphere or ocean. A 1979 nuclear test is suggested by US intelligence, and is believed to have been a violation of this treaty. This test, which was detected in the South African sea, raised red flags and triggered the Glenn Amendment, though sanctions were reportedly avoided.
What is the Glenn Amendment, and how does it relate to the 1979 nuclear test?
The Glenn Amendment to the Arms Export Control Act mandates sanctions against non-NPT nations that detonate a nuclear device after 1977. The 1979 nuclear incident triggered this amendment. However, despite US intelligence conclusions, President Carter reportedly avoided imposing sanctions to protect Middle East policy. As a result, the violation was suppressed.
What was the alleged theft of nuclear material from the NUMEC facility?
The TV series highlights the alleged theft of enriched uranium from the NUMEC (Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation) facility in Apollo,Pennsylvania,in the 1960s and 1970s. The series implies that Israeli spies,arms dealers,and Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan were involved. The series suggests that this material was diverted for Israel’s nuclear program. This incident never resulted in charges.
What role did the U.S. goverment play in relation to Israel’s nuclear program?
The U.S. government has been implicated in several ways, including:
- Covering up or downplaying incidents: The Carter administration, according to reporting, sought to downplay the 1979 nuclear test.
- Maintaining a policy of silence: The U.S. government has maintained a policy of not acknowledging Israel’s nuclear weapons, enforced by a federal secret bulletin.
- Avoiding sanctions: Presidents have reportedly avoided imposing sanctions despite potential violations of international agreements.
- Secret Agreements: A 2018 report suggests a secret agreement between a U.S. President and Israel, promising not to disturb the nuclear program.
What is ”nuclear ambiguity,” and how does Israel employ it?
Nuclear ambiguity is a policy of deliberately not confirming or denying the existence of nuclear weapons. Israel has historically employed this strategy, neither confirming nor denying its nuclear capabilities. This approach has allowed Israel to maintain a deterrent posture without officially declaring its nuclear status, which could trigger increased regional tensions.
How does the U.S. policy of silence affect discussions on Iran’s nuclear ambitions?
the perceived double standard in U.S. policy – silence on Israel’s nuclear program while expressing concerns about Iran – complicates open debate and the honest assessment of nuclear program goals and purpose. This perceived hypocrisy hinders non-proliferation efforts, according to analysts, and potentially undermines the credibility of U.S. policy.
What is the implication of Netanyahu’s statement about the submarine fleet?
In 2016, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implied the nuclear capabilities of a german-supplied submarine fleet. He stated the fleet “acted as a prevention for our enemies,” implying that the submarines – reported to be capable of launching nuclear weapons – enhance Israel’s deterrent capabilities.
Who are Victor Gilinsky and Leonard Weiss, and what is their perspective?
Victor Gilinsky and Leonard Weiss are members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. They argue that “The Atom and Me” only scratches the surface of the known information and that the U.S. government’s handling of Israel’s nuclear program has hindered non-proliferation, creating a hypocrisy that has damaged U.S. policy.
Summarizing this information, what are the key arguments?
Here’s a summary of the key arguments:
| Argument | supporting Detail |
|---|---|
| Israel’s Nuclear Development | Pursued by any means necessary, implying covert actions/material acquisition. |
| U.S. Policy of ambiguity | the US government’s silence on Israel’s nuclear program has prevented accountability and open public discussion. |
| Allegations of Material Theft | Alleged theft of enriched uranium from NUMEC facility, implicating Israeli operatives. |
| 1979 Nuclear Test | Potential violation of international treaties with US coverup to protect Middle East Policies. |
