A stylist with more than 10 years of experience struck a stylist for YouTuber Song Ji-ah (Freesia), who appeared on TV by reviewing or wearing fakes.
On the 18th, on the YouTube channel ‘Entertainment President’, a video titled ‘Fake Freesia… Reasons why incumbent stylists were surprised’ was posted.
The video dealt with the recent controversy surrounding Song Ji-ah’s counterfeiting. The YouTuber said, “Song Ji-ah currently lives in the 28 pyeong of Hangang View Trimaze, and there are suspicions that her agency obtained it for image making. There is also controversy over whether the image of the golden spoon was made.” He said, “Many of the luxury items that Song Ji-ah wore have been found to be fakes, but they are receiving global disgrace.”
In the video, a stylist with 10 years of experience was interviewed. The stylist said, “I can’t wear fakes at all in a drama-like setting. If he is known, he does not wear fakes. “It doesn’t make sense to wear something you don’t know,” he said.
He continued, “Even if I wear S-class fakes, it is burdensome because there are many luxury experts in Korea. It is bound to have a huge impact on the image. In particular, Song Ji-ah was not even an S-class or A-class fake. It’s an ugly fake. Buying mirror grade, S grade, and A grade is not easy. Because there is a seller in China, it can be purchased only after a fortnight after going through a very complicated procedure, so you can’t be unaware of it.”
Earlier, a YouTube channel raised suspicions that Song Ji-ah was wearing a fake. This YouTube channel raised suspicions that the article posted on a luxury cafe, the photos that Song Ji-a posted on social media, and the outfits she wore in ‘Solo Hell’ were fakes.
After the suspicion, Song Ji-ah posted on her Instagram on the 17th, “There is currently a controversy about some of the clothes I wore on SNS and ‘Solo Hell’. The counterfeit controversy you pointed out is partly true. I’m really sorry,” he apologized.
Freesia said, “We once again apologize for all the circumstances that occurred due to the designers’ copyright infringement and ignorance of copyright. As someone who has a dream of launching a brand, I will seriously recognize and reflect on the controversial part.”
[OSEN]
