On the morning of the 6th, Lee Jun-seok, representative of the People’s Power, speaks at the 1st high-ranking party government council held at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jongno-gu, Seoul. National Assembly Photo Foundation
As the meeting of the Party Central Ethics Committee on the 7th to deliberate and decide on Lee Jun-seok, the representative of People’s Power, ‘suspicion of teachers destroying evidence of sexual abuse’ is approaching, the bulletin board of People’s Power is overflowing with articles criticizing Lee.
On the 6th, on the People’s Power bulletin board ‘I have something to say’, various opinions were posted toward CEO Lee Jun-seok, such as “Resign yourself at your own risk” and “This is a serious ethical problem.”
One netizen (youm**) said, “Even if it is a sexual harassment allegation, I think that the public’s trust has been lost and that the party’s reputation should not be maintained even if it is a matter of tarnishing the party’s reputation.” It is best to save him and step back beautifully on his own.”
Another netizen (Kim Sang*) cited “the adverse effect of CEO Lee Jun-seok” as “the reason that the power of the people fell to the 2030 generation in the last presidential and local elections,” and said, “Lee Jun-suk’s suspicion of sexual harassment, feminism, and the controversy over the disabled, etc. As a result, she became a target of hatred by women in their 20s, which led to a surge in approval ratings.”
“The Party Ethics Committee deals with the ethical and moral issues of party members, not the judicial issues dealt with by the sword and the police,” he said. There was also a reaction.
‘I have something to say’ Captured from the People’s Power bulletin board
There was also an article sniping Kwon Seong-dong, the floor leader. One netizen (‘doll**) pointed out, “At the time of the prosecution’s complete deprivation of investigative powers, he had an affair with the Democratic Party, and he puts off remarks a day before Lee Jun-seok’s disciplinary action.” did.
As the party’s Central Ethics Committee’s disciplinary deliberation for various allegations of Chairman Lee approaches, the internal redness is heating up.
Bae Hyun-jin, the People’s Power Supreme Council member, said on Facebook, “‘I didn’t do it. I’m sorry for the water.’ How many months has it been since these ten people said, “If I had done it myself with confidence, how many months would it have been?” criticized as
On the other hand, Rep. Jo Hae-jin, vice chairman of the People’s Power Innovation Committee, said in KBS radio’s ‘Choi Kyung-young’s Strongest Current Affairs’, “We were able to win the presidential and local elections because of the participation of young politicians and party members like Chairman Lee.” It would be very irresponsible if the party leader was disciplined.”
In such a situation, CEO Lee seems not to hide his inconvenience by spewing out remarks that seem to have in mind the conflict situation with the so-called ‘Yun Hee-kwan (a key person on Yoon Seok-yeol’s side)’.
On the 5th, two days before the ‘disciplinary review’, CEO Lee posted a short article on his Facebook page, “What do you mean stop loss? It’s useless.”
This means that, prior to the ethics committee disciplinary deliberation, throwing yourself away as the party leader who led the presidential and June 1 local elections is not a ‘stop loss (selling at a loss)’ but a ‘profit loss (selling at a profit)’, that is,
There are also interpretations as to whether it contains the meaning of
Earlier in December of last year, a video was uploaded on YouTube’s ‘Garosero Research Institute (Ka Se-yeon)’ channel with the title, “Shock alone, receive Lee Jun-seok sexual compensation.”
‘Ga Se-yeon’ side claimed, “In the summer of 2013, Lee Jun-seok received sexual favors from IKAIST CEO Kim Seong-jin at a hotel basement in Daejeon.”
CEO Lee explained, “The attack was based on the suspect’s one-sided statement about a fraud case that had nothing to do with me.”
People’s Power ‘Ethics Committee’ Article 21 (Types and Procedures of Discipline) According to the party rules, △discipline is divided into expulsion, recommendation to leave the party, suspension of party membership, and warning. △Expulsion of party members is confirmed after the resolution of the committee and the resolution of the supreme committee, and the expulsion of members of the National Assembly is confirmed by the approval of at least two-thirds of the total number of members of the general meeting of members after the resolution of the committee.
△If a person who has received a disciplinary resolution for the recommendation to withdraw from the party fails to submit a report of resignation within 10 days from the date of receiving the notice of the decision on the recommendation to leave the party, the committee will not pass the resolution and will be expelled without delay. △ Party membership shall be suspended for a period of not less than 1 month and not more than 3 years.
A Party member who fails to receive training provided by the Party without justifiable reasons or fails to pay party fees for more than three months for one year may suspend the exercise of his/her rights as a Party member by resolution of the Committee. △If additional reasons for disciplinary action occur after disciplinary action, a more severe disciplinary action than the previous one, unless there are special circumstances.
