Newsletter

Lee Nak-yeon “Is it okay if the Democratic Party candidate is not moral? We will uncover corruption in Daejang-dong.”

Former CEO Nak-Yeon Lee / Deli Minju YouTube Capture

On the 25th, former representative Lee Nak-yeon, a candidate for the Democratic Party’s presidential primary, said, “The idea that the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate does not have to be moral is really okay. The startling reality that the Democratic Party candidacy can be pushed back from the people’s strength rather than from the people’s power, is it okay?” “Many people are outraged by the development corruption in Daejang-dong, Seongnam,” said former CEO Lee. The corruption will be thoroughly investigated and anyone involved will be severely punished according to the law.”

At the joint speech held at the Kimdaejung Convention Center in Seo-gu, Gwangju, on the same day, at the joint speech of the Democratic Party in Gwangju and Jeollanam-do, in relation to the governor’s suspicion of the Daejang-dong development project, former CEO Lee said, “According to the law, it is necessary to recover undue profits and compensate for damages such as indigenous people and residents.” would. I will set the real estate justice right,” he said.

Former President Lee said, “The reason that the three presidents, Kim Dae-jung, Roh Moo-hyun, and Moon Jae-in, were able to win was because they were all flawless candidates and candidates that the people could feel at ease. Please command me to say, ‘Go boldly as a candidate with no blemishes, a candidate you can rest assured, that is the way to victory.’ I, Nak-yeon Lee, will be my vote,” he appealed.

“I, Nak-yeon Lee, worked as prime minister after passing through the Moon Jae-in government’s personnel hearing, and was never shaken by the opposition’s verifications and attacks,” he said.

Ex-CEO Lee raised his voice one after another, saying that he was a ‘candidate with no flaws in morality’ and self-proclaimed as “a clean candidate capable of suppressing fouls and privileged forces in the finals, and a tool for re-creating the regime with certainty.”

.