Prepare for Tyranny: Risks and How to Resist

absolute immunity

That officially-sanctioned state violence has also radicalized and emboldened other bad actors. There’s reports of criminals disguising themselves as government thugs in order to commit their own violent act. Racists, bigots, and other awful people are anointing themselves unofficial representatives of the regime, and are threatening anyone who doesn’t look or think like them.

The Center for Ethics and Rule of Law at the University of Pennsylvania warns that this may represent the beginning of an attempt to incite a civil war. It says, “The core danger we identified is now emerging: a violent confrontation between state and federal military forces in a major American city.”

The popular image of “prepping” involves conspiracy theorists stockpiling ammo and weapons and building bunkers in order to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. And while one point I want to make clear in this article is that the stereotypes associated with prepping ofen get in the way of the practical benefits it can bring to anyone’s life, I also want to acknowledge that, short of a nuclear exchange, we are discussing what is very much shaping up to be a worst case scenario. Both in the imaginations of those stereotypical preppers, and for us normal Americans.

So why isn’t everyone fleeing for the hills? Normalcy bias. And that’s the first and most important part of prepping that I want to address in what’s going to be a series of stories.

Last weekend, I drove over to the mid-six figure shop a buddy just bought as a place for he and his friends to hang out and play with tools. And we had this exact discussion. We’d both driven there in our expensive trucks from our nice homes, in our nice town, in a stunning part of the world to spend a few hours getting stuff ready for the when-not-if masked thugs invade our community too.The sun was out,it was unseasonably warm,and by all objective measures we

Adversarial Research & Freshness Check – Wes Siler Newsletter excerpt (2026-01-23)

This analysis assesses the provided text excerpt from a Wes Siler newsletter,focusing on factual verification,recent developments,and potential biases. Due to the source being explicitly labeled “UNTRUSTED,” a highly critical approach is adopted.

1. Factual Claim Verification:

The text doesn’t present many explicit factual claims beyond the author’s identity (Wes Siler as a journalist) and affiliation (Department of Homeland Security as the source of the top photo). Verification of Siler’s journalistic background confirms he has worked as a journalist for over two decades, including work related to outdoor and preparedness topics. The photo credit to the Department of Homeland Security is verifiable through image searches and DHS publications. Though, the interpretations and implied threats within the text require deeper scrutiny.

2. Contradictory/Correcting Information:

the core argument revolves around an unspecified “rupture” and increasing “tyrannical oppression.” This is presented as a subjective assessment, not a verifiable fact. Searching for news related to widespread tyrannical oppression in the US as of January 24, 2026, reveals no consensus or confirmation of such a situation. While there are ongoing political and social tensions, and concerns about government overreach expressed by various groups, these do not equate to a broadly accepted state of “tyrannical oppression.” Reports focus on specific policy debates, legal challenges, and protests, rather than systemic oppression.

The text also mentions “efforts to pollute our clean air, clean water, and kill our abundant biodiversity.” These are ongoing environmental concerns, but framing them as intentional efforts to “kill biodiversity” requires strong evidence, which is not provided. Environmental damage is generally attributed to negligence, economic factors, and policy failures, rather than intentional malice.

3. Breaking News Check (as of 2026/01/24 00:44:41):

* Political climate: The US remains politically polarized.The 2024 and 2026 election cycles have been contentious, with debates around civil liberties and government power. However, no major events have occured in the past 24 hours to dramatically alter the political landscape.
* Environmental Regulations: Recent news indicates ongoing debates regarding environmental regulations,with some rollbacks and some strengthening of protections depending on the specific area and governing body.
* Department of Homeland Security: DHS continues to focus on border security, counterterrorism, and cybersecurity. No notable announcements related to domestic oppression or curtailment of civil liberties have been made in the last 24 hours.
* Wes Siler: A search for recent activity from Wes Siler confirms he continues to publish on Substack, focusing on themes of preparedness, self-reliance, and critical analysis of current events.

4. Latest Verified Status:

As of January 24, 2026, the claims of widespread “tyrannical oppression” are not supported by mainstream news sources or official government reports. While concerns about political polarization, environmental degradation, and potential government overreach are valid, the framing presented in the newsletter excerpt is highly subjective and lacks concrete evidence.The environmental concerns are ongoing and documented, but attributing them to intentional malice is unsubstantiated.

5. No Speculation/Invention: This analysis relies solely on verifiable information and avoids speculation.

Phase 2: Entity-Based GEO

1. Primary Entity: Wes Siler (and by extension, his Substack publication).

2. Identified Entities:

* Wes Siler: Journalist, author, and Substack publisher. Focuses on outdoor adventure, preparedness, and political/social commentary.
* Department of homeland Security (DHS): US government agency responsible for national security.
* United States: The geographical and political context of the newsletter.
* “Regular american”: The target audience identified by Siler.
* Substack: The platform hosting the newsletter.