Razman Verdict: Abroad Without Permission
- Razman Arif Nasution's Defamation Case Verdict Read Despite His Absence
- Razman Arif Nasution, a lawyer, did not attend the verdict reading in his defamation case against Hotman Paris Hutapea.
- * Unapproved travel: Razman claimed he went abroad for medical treatment,but the prosecution stated he left before receiving any doctor's advice to do so,and submitted the letter after...
Here’s a summary of the news article:
Razman Arif Nasution‘s Defamation Case Verdict Read Despite His Absence
Razman Arif Nasution, a lawyer, did not attend the verdict reading in his defamation case against Hotman Paris Hutapea. The prosecution revealed that Razman had traveled abroad without permission from either a doctor or the court.
here are the key points:
* Unapproved travel: Razman claimed he went abroad for medical treatment,but the prosecution stated he left before receiving any doctor’s advice to do so,and submitted the letter after his departure.
* Hospital Confirmation: The court received a letter from Penang Hospital stating Razman didn’t require hospitalization.
* Verdict Proceeded: Despite his absence and lack of permission,the panel of judges decided to proceed with reading the verdict,citing legal provisions allowing them to do so when the defendant has been properly summoned and examined.
* Travel will be considered in the verdict: The judge stated that Razman’s unauthorized travel will be taken into consideration when determining the verdict.