Recent Coupe de France matches have showcased strong performances from Olympique de Marseille, with notable wins against Bourg-Péronnas and Bayeux. These victories, occurring in January 2026, demonstrate the team’s current form as they advance in the tournament.
Marseille’s Dominant Form in Coupe de France
On 2026, Marseille delivered a commanding 6-0 victory over Bourg-Péronnas in a Coupe de France match. Key players contributing to this win included Paixão, Greenwood and Højbjerg, highlighting a strong team effort. This performance underscores Marseille’s offensive capabilities and tactical prowess.
Further solidifying their position in the Coupe de France, Marseille secured a decisive 9-0 win against Bayeux. A standout performance by Greenwood, who scored a hat-trick, was instrumental in this rout of the amateur side. This match, also in , further illustrates Marseille’s dominance in the early stages of the competition.
Lens and Troyes Clash in Round of 16
A recent match report details a contest between Racing and ESTAC Troyes in the round of 16 of the Coupe de France Crédit Agricole. The match, held on Wednesday evening at the Stade de l’Aube, presented a significant challenge for Racing against the Ligue 2 BKT leaders. Racing aimed to build on their recent success against Le Havre AC and continue a winning streak to secure qualification for the quarter-finals.
The first half of the match saw a period of observation between the two teams. Stéphane Dumont’s men controlled possession and attempted to establish their rhythm. Racing, however, remained well-positioned and posed a threat on the counterattack, with a promising cross from Saud Abdulhamid in the 13th minute. Robin Risser, the goalkeeper, was called into action to deflect a long-range attempt from Mouhamed Diop in the 15th minute.
Both teams continued to create opportunities. Kyllian Antonio came close to scoring from a corner in the 18th minute, while Abdallah Sima attempted a shot from distance in the 24th minute, following good work from Florian Sotoca and Rayan Fofana. Sima had another opportunity in the 32nd minute, but his attempt was thwarted by Hillel Konaté’s save. A free kick from Mathys Detourbet in the 35th minute was also skillfully saved by Risser.
Sotoca’s Goal and a Contested First Half
Florian Sotoca, starting in his third Coupe de France match of the season, opened the scoring for Racing in the 41st minute. A precise pass from Malang Sarr found Matthieu Udol on the left side of the area, who then delivered a “caviar” pass to Sotoca, allowing him to head the ball into the net. This goal marked Sotoca’s first of the season and gave Racing a 1-0 lead.
Following the goal, Racing pressed for a second, with Andrija Bulatovic setting up Sima for another attempt. However, Troyes responded quickly, equalizing in added time (45’+3) after a blocked shot from Martin Adeline. The first half concluded with a 1-1 scoreline, characterized by a contested and lively pace.
The report indicates that Racing demonstrated incisive play when accelerating, creating opportunities to regain the advantage after the break. The match was described as a back-and-forth affair, with both teams displaying a strong desire to advance in the Coupe de France.
Ndayishimiye’s Pursuit of Form
In related news, Youssouf Ndayishimiye is reportedly focused on regaining his form after a disruptive 2024. While details of his specific challenges weren’t provided, the report suggests he is working to return to his previous level of performance. This individual player development occurs alongside the team’s broader successes in the Coupe de France.
Braga Eliminates Monaco from European Competition
Separately, Braga eliminated Monaco from European competition, bringing an abrupt end to Monaco’s European adventure. This outcome, while not directly related to Marseille or the Coupe de France, highlights the competitive landscape of European football and the challenges faced by teams in various tournaments.
OM Benefited from VA’s Absence
Recent reports suggest that Olympique de Marseille (OM) benefited from the absence of VA during a French Cup match. The specifics of VA’s absence and the nature of the benefit were not detailed in the provided information.
