Red Card Ruling: Supreme Court Backs Teacher in Jeonju Incident, Deems it a ‘Legitimate Educational Act
Jeonbuk Teachers’ Federation Demands Action Against Malicious Complaints
The Jeonbuk Teachers’ Federation, the Jeonbuk Teachers’ Union, the Jeonbuk branch of the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union, teachers and parents affected by malicious complaints held a press conference at the Jeonbuk Special Self-Governing Provincial Office of Education.
Supreme Court Recognizes Teacher’s Actions as Legitimate Educational Act
The Supreme Court has recognized a teacher’s act of putting the name tags of students who misbehaved during class next to the red cards on the blackboard as a legitimate educational act, not child abuse.
According to the Jeonbuk Education and Human Rights Center, a decision was made to dismiss the re-appeal to the Supreme Court for a child abuse lawsuit filed by parents of Jeonju A Elementary School.
The dismissal of the trial failure means that the appellate court judged that there were no issues to dispute on factual or legal issues at the stage of reviewing the original trial’s decision once again, and that a second appeal was not warranted.
The ‘Red Card’ Incident
The red card incident occurred in April 2021, when a student was cautioned for making a loud noise by twisting an empty plastic bottle with his hand during class. However, when he continued to twist the plastic bottle and make a noise, teacher B attached the student’s name tag next to the red card.
This student cleaned the classroom after school. The student’s mother, Mr. C, did not allow the student to attend school for a certain period of time and continuously requested the principal to replace the homeroom teacher, filing several complaints with the relevant authorities.
The student’s mother claimed that her child was diagnosed with night terrors, a type of sleep disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder due to Mr. A’s emotional abuse.
Prosecution and Constitutional Court Rulings
The prosecution decided that although teacher B’s actions amounted to emotional abuse, it was a minor case and suspended the indictment against Mr. A.
Accordingly, teacher A filed a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court, claiming that the disposition was unfair, and the Constitutional Court canceled the suspended indictment against Mr. A with the unanimous opinion of the judges.
