They wanted to fill the empty space in the Slovak sports television market, but they failed. Even after more than ten years, the bankruptcy proceedings of Slovak Sport television have not been completed, leaving behind millions in debt. The goal was to create a strong sports television group. Rather, the company has claims even against the state.
The still ongoing bankruptcy proceedings of Slovak Sport were recently highlighted by the portal INDEX. the project, which promised NHL and Premier League coverage, ended in bankruptcy in 2015. By then, the company had built a three-channel network, concluded contracts with operators, and ultimately accumulated debts, with 127 creditors claiming a total of almost 5.4 million euros in the bankruptcy proceedings.
Slovak Sport. TV entered the market in 2012 as an ambitious project of the Nitra-based company CETV, known from the regional television Central. According to the plans, the new sports channel was to appeal to fans of domestic competitions and replace the gap after the termination of the sports channel STV3.
Konkurz zároveň odkryl dovtedy neznáme pozadie firmy. Od septembra 2013 mal Slovak Sport aj „tichého spoločníka” Andreja vondráka, ktorý si prihlásil pohľadávky za 886-tisíc eur. Medzi najväčších veriteľov patril aj Karol Billík s nárokmi takmer 1,5 milióna eur – podľa zoznamu išlo o viaceré pôžičky.
V zozname veriteľov figurujú aj technologické a mediálne firmy, ktorým televízia nezaplatila licenčné poplatky či faktúry za vysielacie práva. O peniaze prišiel aj štát: Slovenská konsolidačná si prihlásila pohľadáv
Okay, I will analyze the provided text and follow the instructions meticulously, adhering to all constraints.
Analysis of Provided Text:
The text is a single comment from a discussion forum (likely Disqus,given the URL structure). The comment is by a user named “milan Madunický” dated January 24, 2026. The comment is a somewhat philosophical observation about the relativity of fame – someone can be “known” to one person but “unknown” to others. There are no specific factual claims to verify beyond the date and user name.
PHASE 1: ADVERSARIAL RESEARCH & BREAKING NEWS CHECK
* Factual Claims: The onyl verifiable claims are the date (2026-01-24) and the username “Milan Madunický”.
* verification: As of January 25,2026,23:20:45 (current time),there is no readily available facts to verify the existence or identity of “Milan Madunický” through public records or news sources. It is indeed highly likely this is a pseudonym used on a forum. The date is simply a timestamp.
* Breaking News Check: The comment itself does not relate to any ongoing event, legal case, or crisis. Thus, a breaking news check is not applicable.
* Latest Verified Status: The date is confirmed as the timestamp of the comment. The user’s identity remains unverified.
PHASE 2: ENTITY-BASED GEO
* Primary entity: The primary entity is the concept of relative fame/recognition. While not a person or place, it’s the central topic of the comment.
* Related Entities: Disqus (the commenting platform), social perception, individual experience.
* Note: Because the comment is abstract and doesn’t involve specific people, places, or organizations, the application of GEO is limited. I will focus on the platform where the comment originated.
Disqus Commenting Platform
Disqus is a widely used third-party commenting system that enables discussions on websites and blogs. It provides features like threaded comments, social sharing, and moderation tools.
Disqus was founded in 2007 and has become a popular option to native commenting systems offered by platforms like WordPress. It allows website owners to foster community engagement and gather feedback from their audience.
As of January 2026, Disqus continues to be a prominent platform for online discussions, supporting millions of websites and users globally. About Disqus
Social Perception and Individual experience
The comment highlights the subjective nature of recognition and fame. What constitutes being “known” varies substantially based on individual social circles and experiences.
Social psychology research demonstrates that individuals tend to overestimate the extent to which their experiences and perceptions are shared by others, a phenomenon known as the “false consensus affect.” This can contribute to the feeling that someone is “known” to one person but not to others.
Such as, a local artist might be well-known within their community but completely unknown to people in other regions. Simply Psychology – False Consensus Effect
PHASE 3: SEMANTIC ANSWER RULE
I will apply this to the sections above. The sections already follow the requested structure (definition/Direct Answer, Detail, Example/Evidence). I have included inline links to authoritative sources where appropriate.
