Newsletter

The young man who sang was secretly filmed by a colleague, accused of sleeping secretly until he was fired, and the parties were countered by various films.

A young man is suing his colleague for secretly filming him sleeping during work until he was fired. just on to the boss but he didn’t complain He resigned himself again and again

In the case of one TikTok user who posted a video clip of the incident. Work until you pass out on the floor. but co-workers in the same department Take a picture and sue the boss, accusing him of sleeping in the end, losing his job and being sacked

Most recently, yesterday (September 12) Mr. Srithanalert with Pol Lt. Col. Sombat Meemom, Inspector of Investigation. Bang Khun Thian Police Station to record daily and prepare to meet with lawyers to sue the female counterparts who secretly take pictures while he was unconscious While on duty selling mattresses in a Kamnan Maen district department store before being complain of sleeping until the company fires and unable to apply for a job because of a history of sleeping at work

Srithanalert Mr revealed that It’s against company rules. together with pointing out to people who secretly take pictures of themselves that he has insomnia In addition, on the morning of the incident (August 21), he did not eat. Along with working hard continuously until 11:00 am, the symptoms developed, so I told the staff members. Ask to sit and rest in the space between the beds. but then he lost consciousness

until the boss came and asked what was wrong So he told the story before the boss informed him that he had asked for a warning for breaking company rules. This is my first warning since I started working. Then during the night that day another supervisor called me that I don’t have to come to work anymore. Due to customer complaints, he was fired.

He was shocked and explained that this was the first offence. According to the regulations, the company must receive 3 warning notices before it will be penalized. Therefore, they consider themselves unfair. and believe that the person who complained was the same employee in the department store Not the customer as claimed

After the incident, he went to talk to the person who took the photo. and explain the story But the other party claimed that was not their duty. that they must know who has fainted which he sees as such an act, it makes others suffer personally being fired Refused to apply for a new job because of his resume. In addition, the issue of expenses within the family made a huge impression therefore wishing to file a lawsuit against the parties

During the victim’s conversations with reporters, they brought evidence such as a patient card. Insomnia clinic in Bang Bon area. he came out to show as evidence that there was real treatment

Later, reporters had the opportunity to call and speak with the parties. Ms Bus (pseudonym) took the photo. It was revealed that the photo was taken while the worker was actually sleeping. But it is sent to the supervisor to consider the regulations when performing duties. not being a complaint until fired

In terms of complaints, it was found that customers saw the incident, so they took a picture and submitted a complaint to the head office. The claim that the complaint was made by the workers’ group is not true. Currently, the head office is gathering evidence to file a complaint against the former employee.

and confirm that the company has not been fired in any way. which referred to having to come out alone The reason for giving the news is only a claim. without supporting evidence Personally, there is nothing to be rude about. or speak to the parties

Police Colonel Wisit Sangkanun, Superintendent of Bang Khun Thian Police Station. He said that initially the investigating officer made a daily record. Willing to recommend bringing the back of the foundation to discuss with the Department of Labor to understand and act But if you are still unhappy, come back and consult a lawyer to see if the prosecution can be more moderate .

If there is a wish or if it is within the scope of a crime, they can come back and inform the investigating officer. but if it is a civil offence, victims can sue themselves through the courts for consideration.