Trump Supports Musk’s Demand for Federal Employee Accountability

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has voiced support for Elon Musk’s directive that federal employees must explain their recent accomplishments by the end of Monday or risk being fired. This edict has sparked new litigation and added to the turmoil within the government workforce.

“What he’s doing is saying, ‘Are you actually working?’” Trump said in the Oval Office during a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron. “And then, if you don’t answer, like, you’re sort of semi-fired or you’re fired, because a lot of people aren’t answering because they don’t even exist.”

The Republican president asserted that Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency has found “hundreds of billions of dollars in fraud” as he suggested that federal paychecks are going to nonexistent employees. He did not present evidence for his claims.

Attorneys representing unions, businesses, veterans, and conservation organizations filed an updated lawsuit in federal court in California on Monday, arguing Musk had violated the law with his demand. The Office of Personnel Management, which functions as a human resources agency for the federal government, told employees to detail five things they did last week by the end of Monday.

The lawsuit, spearheaded by the State Democracy Defenders Fund, called the threat of mass firings “one of the most massive employment frauds in the history of this country.”

Anna Kelly, a White House deputy press secretary, criticized the litigation by saying, “In the time it took these employees on taxpayer-funded salaries to file a frivolous lawsuit, they could have briefly recapped their accomplishments to their managers, as is common in the private sector, 100 times over.”

Musk is leading Trump’s efforts to overhaul and downsize the federal government. They’ve urged employees to resign, directed agencies to lay off probationary workers, and halted work at some agencies altogether.

There has been pushback in protests around Washington and from within the government. The Office of Special Counsel, a watchdog for the federal workforce, said Monday that the firing of several probationary workers may be illegal. Trump is trying to fire the office’s leader, Hampton Dellinger, in a case that has reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

Dellinger asked the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board to stop layoffs of six employees, but suggested that many more workers should also be protected from losing their jobs.

There are also signs Musk is testing the limits of his influence. Some administration officials — including some of Trump’s most strident allies, including FBI Director Kash Patel — have told employees not to respond to the email requesting five things they did, citing privacy or security concerns and noting that agencies have their own processes for evaluating employees.

“When and if further information is required, we will coordinate the responses. For now, please pause any responses,” Patel wrote in an email.

It has been the most significant public divergence between the billionaire entrepreneur and Senate-approved Cabinet leaders who have otherwise been enthusiastic about fulfilling Musk’s objectives.

Trump dismissed the idea there was any kind of split involving his most powerful adviser. “They don’t mean that in any way combatively with Elon,” he said, adding that “everyone thought it was a pretty ingenious idea.”

The Office of Personnel Management declined to comment on Monday while Musk continued to threaten federal workers with layoffs. “Those who do not take this email seriously will soon be furthering their career elsewhere,” he posted on X, his social media platform.

The latest turbulence began over the weekend, when Trump posted on his social media website: “ELON IS DOING A GREAT JOB, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIM GET MORE AGGRESSIVE.” Musk followed by saying, “All federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week.” He claimed, “Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.” The directive echoed how the entrepreneur has managed his own companies.

The Office of Personnel Management sent out its own request afterward. “Please reply to this email with approx. 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week and cc your manager,” the message said. However, it said nothing about the potential for employees being fired for noncompliance. The deadline was listed as 11:59 p.m. EST Monday.

There was swift resistance from several key U.S. agencies led by the president’s loyalists — including the State Department, Homeland Security, and the Pentagon — which instructed their employees over the weekend not to respond. Lawmakers in both major political parties said Musk’s mandate may be illegal.

Justice Department employees were told in an email Monday morning that they don’t need to respond to the request “due to the confidential and sensitive nature of the Department’s work.”

But employees in the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington were instructed to respond “in general terms,” leaving out case-specific or otherwise sensitive information. In an email viewed by The Associated Press, attorneys were provided with guidance about how to respond about the number of court hearings they attended, defendants they charged, cases they resolved, or other tasks.

Education Department workers were directed to comply on Monday morning. “The email is legitimate and employees should respond,” wrote Rachel Oglesby, chief of staff at the department.

Thousands of government employees have been forced out of the federal workforce — either by being fired or through a “deferred resignation” offer — during the first month of Trump’s second term. There’s no official figure available for the total firings or layoffs, but the AP has tallied hundreds of thousands of workers who are being affected. Many work outside of Washington.

Recent developments indicate that the federal government is undergoing significant changes under the Trump administration, with Musk’s influence playing a pivotal role. Critics argue that these changes could lead to a more efficient government, while others worry about the potential for widespread job losses and the disruption of essential services. The ongoing legal battles and internal resistance highlight the complexity and controversy surrounding these initiatives.

As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how these changes will impact the federal workforce and the services they provide to American citizens. The public and lawmakers alike are watching closely, as the future of federal employment and government efficiency hangs in the balance.

For further insights and analysis, stay tuned to newsdirectory3.com for the latest updates and expert commentary on this developing story.

___

Our team of journalists, including experts in government affairs and labor law, contributed to this report.