Trump FCC Raises Inmate Phone Call Prices for Private Prisons & Telecoms
- This article reports on a recent decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to raise the maximum price for prison phone calls, effectively reversing a cap implemented during...
- * Price Increase: The FCC voted 2-1 to roll back Biden-era caps on prison phone call costs, perhaps costing incarcerated individuals and thier families hundreds of millions of...
- In essence, the FCC's decision is criticized as predatory, benefiting corporations at the expense of incarcerated individuals and their families, and potentially fueled by industry influence.
Summary of the Article: FCC Raises Prison Phone Call Rates, Reversing Biden-Era Caps
This article reports on a recent decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to raise the maximum price for prison phone calls, effectively reversing a cap implemented during the Biden administration. This move is seen as a benefit to telecom firms and private prison companies.
Key Points:
* Price Increase: The FCC voted 2-1 to roll back Biden-era caps on prison phone call costs, perhaps costing incarcerated individuals and thier families hundreds of millions of dollars annually.
* Financial Burden on Families: Families already struggle with high costs, sometimes exceeding $500/month, leading to debt and sacrifices in essential needs like food and medical care to maintain contact with incarcerated loved ones.
* Potential Commission Revival: The FCC is considering revoking a Biden-era ban on commission payments from telecom companies to jails and prisons – a practise that incentivizes higher rates.
* Industry Influence: The article highlights the financial ties between the private prison industry and the election of Donald Trump, suggesting a connection between political support and favorable policy decisions.
* Kickback System: Telecom companies offer “commissions” (kickbacks) to prison operators, incentivizing them to award contracts to companies charging the highest fees.
In essence, the FCC’s decision is criticized as predatory, benefiting corporations at the expense of incarcerated individuals and their families, and potentially fueled by industry influence.