Supreme Court Allows Migrant Deportations to Third Countries to ⁤resume

‍ ⁤Updated June 23, 2025
⁣

The ‍Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to resume its policy of quickly deporting migrants to countries other than their homeland. This ⁣decision overturns a lower court ruling that had‍ required the⁤ government to allow migrants to challenge their deportations.

The ‍high court’s majority issued a brief⁤ order without detailing their reasoning, a common practice for emergency docket⁢ rulings. All ‍three liberal justices ⁣dissented from the decision.

The ⁢case⁢ arose after an incident in May when immigration‍ officials attempted to⁤ deport eight individuals to South Sudan. The flight was⁢ diverted to Djibouti after ⁣a⁤ judge⁤ intervened.

The migrants,including ⁢individuals from Myanmar,Vietnam,and Cuba,had been convicted⁢ of violent crimes in the U.S. officials⁤ stated they were unable ‍to quickly return them to their home countries.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissenting opinion, warned that the court’s ‍action exposes “thousands to the ‍risk of torture or death.”‍ She‍ added,⁤ “The ⁣government has made⁤ clear ⁢in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained ⁢by law, free ⁢to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be⁢ heard.” Justices Elena Kagan⁢ and ketanji brown Jackson joined Sotomayor’s dissent.

Trina Realmuto, executive⁣ director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said lawyers for some of the ⁣migrants would continue ⁣to ⁢fight the deportations in court. “The ramifications of ⁤Supreme Court’s order will be horrifying,” Realmuto⁤ said.

Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, hailed the decision as a “MAJOR win for the safety and security of the American people” in a social⁤ media post.

The⁤ Supreme court’s ⁤action suspends an order from U.S. District Judge⁣ Brian E. Murphy ⁣in⁢ Boston. Murphy had ruled in April that individuals must⁢ have ⁤the opportunity to argue that deportation to a third country would endanger them, even if they had exhausted their legal appeals.

Judge Murphy found that the May deportation flight to⁣ South Sudan ⁢violated his ⁤order.He instructed immigration authorities to allow individuals to raise their concerns through legal counsel. The migrants were held in a converted shipping container in ⁣djibouti, where they and the officers guarding them faced tough conditions.

The Trump administration has agreements with countries like Panama and Costa Rica to house⁣ immigrants, as‍ some nations do not accept U.S. deportations. South Sudan has experienced ongoing violence since its independence in 2011.

Another order ⁢from Judge Murphy led to the Trump administration returning a gay Guatemalan man, identified as OCG in court ⁣documents, who had been wrongly deported to Mexico. He reported being raped and extorted in Mexico. ⁤OCG was the frist ⁣person known to have been ‍returned to U.S. custody after deportation since the start of Trump’s second term.

What’s next

Legal challenges are expected to ⁤continue as advocates for migrants seek to protect individuals from being deported to unsafe third⁤ countries. The focus will likely be on ensuring due process and preventing deportations that could lead to torture or death.