Trump on Iran: Regime Change After US Strikes
- Following joint U.S.-Israeli military action against Iranian nuclear facilities, President Donald Trump has suggested a potential change in leadership in Iran.
- Trump's social media post on Sunday questioned why a "regime change" wouldn't be considered if Iran's current leaders couldn't "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN." This statement followed Saturday's strikes,...
- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance had both stated the military action was not intended to topple Iran's government. elliott abrams, a former U.S.
Following U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Donald Trump has ignited a firestorm by suggesting a potential regime change in Iran.This dramatic shift in rhetoric, questioning why Iran’s leadership shouldn’t be replaced, directly contradicts prior statements from top officials who denied this as a goal. Trump’s provocative stance comes amid rising tensions and Iran’s vow of retaliation. The stakes are high, with Iran considering closing the Strait of Hormuz and the U.S. military on high alert. Learn more about the escalating situation and its global implications from news Directory 3. Discover what’s next …
Trump Floats Iran Regime Change After US-Israel Nuclear Facility Strikes
Updated June 23,2025
Following joint U.S.-Israeli military action against Iranian nuclear facilities, President Donald Trump has suggested a potential change in leadership in Iran. The strikes, which targeted three sites, aimed to curtail Tehran’s nuclear program.
Trump’s social media post on Sunday questioned why a “regime change” wouldn’t be considered if Iran’s current leaders couldn’t “MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.” This statement followed Saturday’s strikes, which used “bunker-buster” bombs, and appeared to contradict earlier assertions from top officials.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance had both stated the military action was not intended to topple Iran’s government. elliott abrams, a former U.S. envoy to Iran, suggested Trump might be “kidding around,” downplaying the seriousness of the post.
The strikes followed escalating tensions between Israel and Iran,triggered by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s efforts to dismantle Iran’s nuclear research. Both Netanyahu and Trump have expressed concerns about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, which Iran denies intending to weaponize.
The UN’s nuclear watchdog has called for a ceasefire to allow for inspections. Meanwhile, iran has promised “everlasting consequences” in response to the attacks. The Israeli military reported Monday that missiles were launched from Iran toward Israel, and that six Iranian airports were attacked.
The U.S. department of State issued a global warning, urging increased caution for U.S. citizens worldwide.Approximately 40,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East are on high alert, bracing for potential Iranian retaliation.
Iranian state TV reported that the country’s parliament approved a measure to potentially close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical trade route for nearly a quarter of the world’s oil and gas. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged China to intervene and prevent the closure.
Iran’s foreign minister traveled to Moscow to discuss “common challenges and threats” with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
What’s next
The international community awaits Iran’s response, with concerns mounting over potential disruptions to global trade and further escalation in the region. The U.S. military remains on high alert,while diplomatic efforts continue to de-escalate tensions.