Villaraigosa & Fossil Fuels: Governor’s Race Stance
- Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa,a one-time champion of environmental causes,is now defending California's oil industry.
- Villaraigosa, who is running for governor, has accepted over $176,000 in contributions from donors connected to the oil industry since entering the race.
- The issue gained prominence after Valero and Phillips 66 announced the closures of Bay Area and Wilmington refineries, respectively.
Antonio Villaraigosa, a former environmental advocate, now defends California’s oil industry, a major shift in his stance as the state pushes for climate change leadership. The primary_keyword is Villaraigosa’s evolving view on fossil fuels, driven by concerns over gas prices impacting working-class residents, signaling a pragmatic approach to energy policy. Environmental groups, however, voice disappointment over his recent fundraising from the oil industry, contrasting sharply with his earlier pledges. This unexpected pivot, explored by the team at News Directory 3, highlights the complexities of the governor’s race and the balancing act between environmentalism and economic realities. Discover what’s next for California’s energy future and how the 2026 election might reshape the state’s policies, including secondary_keyword like industry ties and cost of living, in the coming months.
Villaraigosa Defends California Oil Industry Amid Climate Goals
Updated May 26,2025
Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa,a one-time champion of environmental causes,is now defending California’s oil industry. This shift comes as the state aims to be a leader in combating climate change. Villaraigosa’s defense is rooted in concerns about the potential for soaring gas prices for California drivers.
Villaraigosa, who is running for governor, has accepted over $176,000 in contributions from donors connected to the oil industry since entering the race. This includes money from companies operating oil fields in the San Joaquin Valley and Los Angeles county.
The issue gained prominence after Valero and Phillips 66 announced the closures of Bay Area and Wilmington refineries, respectively. Villaraigosa argues that policies he deems “absurd” may have contributed to these closures.
“I’m not fighting for refineries,” Villaraigosa said. “I’m fighting for the people who pay for gas in this state.”
His stance has drawn criticism from environmental groups. RL Miller, president of Climate Hawks Vote, expressed shock at Villaraigosa’s recent contributions, noting that he had previously pledged not to accept money from oil companies.
Villaraigosa maintains that the economic landscape has changed since 2018, and that rising costs of living are hurting working-class Americans. He believes an “all-of-the-above” energy approach, including oil and gas, is necessary to reach net-zero emissions.
Thad Kousser, a political science professor at UC San Diego, notes that Villaraigosa occupies a moderate position in the governor’s race, focusing on cost-of-living issues.
Other Democratic candidates, including Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and former U.S.Rep.Katie Porter, have pledged not to accept oil industry contributions.
Villaraigosa defends his environmental record,citing his efforts as mayor to reduce emissions and expand mass transit. However, he argues that climate change initiatives should not disproportionately burden low-income residents.
Lorena Gonzalez, leader of the California Labor Federation, agrees that refinery closures pose a threat to workers and gas prices.She argues that California is not yet ready to abandon fossil fuels entirely.
What’s next
California faces ongoing debates about balancing environmental goals with economic realities, notably regarding the cost of living and the future of the oil industry. The outcome of the 2026 gubernatorial election could considerably influence the state’s energy policies.