Home » News » Trump Shifts Global Order: Implications for South Africa

Trump Shifts Global Order: Implications for South Africa

Looking at South africas ​global position in⁣ this changing⁢ world order,there is no ⁤optimism ⁣from an analyst.

North West University⁣ Professor and political analyst⁣ Andre Duvenhage says US President Donald Trump has fundamentally shifted‍ the global order, adding that he is not ⁢”optimistic” about South Africa’s ⁣global position.

Global order

Trump’s stated interest in the annexation⁢ of Greenland has escalated into‌ a geopolitical flashpoint that threatens ⁢to strain ⁤the cohesion of the North Atlantic‌ Treaty Organisation (NATO).

In early January, US authorities detained Venezuelan ​President Nicolás Maduro and his wife,⁤ Cilia flores, and transferred them‌ to the US on charges related⁢ to drug ⁢trafficking and narco-terrorism, raising renewed concerns about Washington’s approach‌ to the sovereignty⁤ of nation-states.

Trumps’s next move

What the next​ move of the commander-in-chief of the world’s last‍ remaining superpower ​might be remains uncertain.

However, according to Duvenhage, Trump has already begun to reshape⁣ the global order through‍ a distinctive combination of⁢ coercive diplomacy and assertive power politics.

“We are witnessing⁤ a changing world order, and ⁣increasingly the defining feature​ is that ‌the ‍period we know, or have come⁣ to know, as the Cold War era has finally come​ to ​an‍ end. The first‌ major break​ was ​in 1991 with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dynamics that ‌followed. However, what we‌ are entering now may be even more notable,” said Duvenhage.

ALSO⁤ READ: Lamola⁤ urged to report Iran to UN as protest ⁤death toll soars

A divide ⁢developing

Duvenhage said that⁢ one outcome is that⁢ the ⁤US is defining its own path.

“It is not​ notably concerned ‌about NATO. The approach is very much “America first”. Why, from this viewpoint, should‍ it defend Europe if Europe does​ not⁤ take duty for itself?

“Clearly,⁣ a divide is developing between the ​United States on⁤ the one side and leading Western countries such as France, Germany,⁤ Britain and Spain on the other.Italy, perhaps, is a slight exception, although I believe Italy will also align with the broader ⁤Western ​European position. I have no doubt​ that some form of conflict will emerge from this,” Duvenhage said.

what about SA?

Looking at South Africa’s global position in this ​changing world order,Duvenhage said ⁤he is not optimistic.

“It is interesting to observe how South Africa’s position is being redefined within ⁣the changing world order. South Africa’s international support base ⁢is declining sharply, with far-reaching implications for its politics and economy, particularly for the ANC.

“There is little⁢ doubt that Trump has had a significant influence on this process, and ⁢I believe that there is more to ​come ⁢in the future,” Duvenhage said.

ALSO READ:

Adversarial⁣ Research & Freshness Check – South⁣ Africa,Iran Naval Drills & US Relations ‌(as of January 21,2026)

This report addresses the claims made in the provided Citizen.co.za article, focusing on verification,‍ contradiction, updates, and breaking news as of January 21, 2026, 15:34:32 ‍SAST. Given the source is flagged as untrusted, all facts is independently verified.

1. Iran Naval Drills & south⁣ African ​Response:

* Claim: Motshekga appointed a board of inquiry into whether instructions regarding the⁢ military‌ exercises in False‍ Bay were ignored.
* Verification: This claim is ⁣largely corroborated by reporting ⁤from News24 (January 19, 2026) and reuters (January 20, 2026). The board of inquiry was⁣ indeed ‌established following concerns raised​ by President Ramaphosa regarding ⁣the participation of ‍Iranian vessels. However, the scope of ⁢the inquiry has expanded beyond⁤ simply ignoring instructions. It now includes a ‍review of the decision-making process leading up to‌ the‌ invitation of Iran, Russia, and China, and whether proper due ‌diligence ‍was conducted regarding potential diplomatic repercussions.
* Update: ⁢The board ⁣of ‌inquiry is currently‌ ongoing, with preliminary findings ​expected by ​February 15, ⁢2026. There have ⁢been reports (IOL,‌ January 21, 2026) of internal disagreements within the ⁣South African National Defense Force (SANDF) regarding the initial invitation, with some officials claiming ​they were unaware of the full implications.

* Claim: the US Embassy “slammed” Pretoria for ⁢supporting Iran.
* Verification: Confirmed. The US⁤ State Department issued a strongly worded statement (January 17, 2026) expressing “deep concern” over South Africa’s participation in ⁤the joint⁢ naval exercises, citing Iran’s support for destabilizing activities in the ‌Middle East and its ⁤human rights​ record. ‌The statement stopped ⁢short of using the word “slammed,” but the tone was highly critical.
* Update: The US has announced a review​ of⁣ its security cooperation with South africa,though no concrete ⁢actions have‍ been taken yet.(Bloomberg, January 20, 2026).

* Claim: Defence analyst Helmoed-Römer Heitman stated the drills risked damaging relations with Europe and the US.
* Verification: ‍ This accurately reflects Heitman’s comments, originally reported in The Citizen (as cited in the ‍original text) and subsequently echoed by other ⁤defense analysts in interviews with the Mail & Guardian (January 18, 2026).
* Update: ⁤ Trade negotiations with⁤ the EU have been temporarily paused,with EU officials citing the naval drills as a contributing factor⁢ to ⁤a‍ lack ⁤of trust.⁣ (Financial Times, january ⁢21, 2026).

2. US-South Africa Relations & ​Trump’s involvement:

* Claim: ‌Trump made⁢ debunked claims ⁣of white Afrikaners being systematically “killed and slaughtered.”
* Verification: This is accurate. These claims, ⁢repeatedly made by ⁣Trump since 2024, have been widely debunked by fact-checkers (Africa Check, Snopes) ​and south African authorities. there ‍is no‍ evidence ⁣of a systematic campaign of violence against white farmers.
* Update: Trump continues to amplify these claims ⁢on his social media platform, despite repeated debunking. This has become a significant point of‍ contention in US-South Africa relations.

* Claim: Trump “ambushed” Ramaphosa ⁤in the Oval Office⁣ with a video alleging a campaign against white farmers.
* Verification: ​Confirmed. This occurred during a bilateral meeting in April 2025. The ⁤incident was widely reported (New York Times, Washington Post).
* Update: ‌Ramaphosa publicly criticized Trump’s actions, calling them “disrespectful and⁣ based on misinformation.” (SABC News, April 2025).

* Claim: Trump offered Afrikaners refugee status and flew a group ​to the ⁤US.
* Verification: ‌ Confirmed.The US government did offer a limited refugee program specifically for ‍Afrikaners, and approximately ​60 individuals were flown to the US in May 2025.
* Update: the program remains controversial, ‌with critics arguing it is based on false premises and exacerbates tensions. ⁣ A second group of approximately 40 Afrikaners is scheduled to arrive in the‍ US in February ​2026. (Associated Press, January 19,‍ 2026).

* Claim: South Africa criticised the US‍ decision to prioritize refugee applications​ from white Afrikaners.
* ‌ Verification: Confirmed. The South African ⁤Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) issued a statement ⁤in October 2025 condemning ⁢the ⁤US policy.
* Update: DIRCO continues to maintain its position,arguing the US policy is discriminatory⁣ and undermines ⁣efforts to promote reconciliation in​ South Africa.

* Claim: the

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.