An aspiring bioengineer, Alex Sathler was walking through the streets of London with a friend last summer when he pulled out his phone adn saw that he’d been chosen for a prestigious National Science Foundation fellowship right before entering graduate school. He couldn’t believe his luck.
The Graduate Research Fellowship Programme award comes with an annual stipend of $37,000 for three years, giving him major street cred in an academic system where securing funding can make or break careers. Around 12,000 students apply for the NSF fellowship each year, with just 1,000 to 2,000 winners selected annually. More than 40 past recipients have gone on to win Nobel Prizes.
“I was glowing that whole day,” said Sathler,who went to community college in Portland,Ore., before attending Oregon State University, where he fell in love with research.But in a year when the Trump administration upended the science ecosystem, having his own funding didn’t turn out to be a golden ticket. The first-year Ph.D. student, who’s enrolled in a program run jointly by the University of California, Berkeley, and UC San Francisco, was turned away by two labs where he had hoped to work on his dissertation. The lab heads told him they just can’t afford to take on more students right now. Another hasn’t replied at all. Many of his classmates have had similar experiences, he added.”Everyone in my program deserves to be in their dream lab,” he said. “The real sense that I get is that there aren’t enough labs with funding to give everyone their best fit.”
Sathler and his cohort aren’t alone. First-year biomedical graduate students throughout the country told STAT that labs have been hesitant to take them in due to a tenuous funding environment, with the National Institutes of Health funding fewer projects last year and on track to do the same in 2026. The current climate has heated up competition for scarce slots in well-funded labs and left some students disillusioned when professors who’d said they would be happy to have them join have reneged on commitments.
These issues are more likely to prolong students’ search for a lab than to keep them out of one altogether, in certain specific cases leading them to work on projects they’re less interested in. But the uncertainty is causing some budding scientists to question whether they can carve out careers in the fiercely competitive world of academic research, where there are NIH Funding Cuts and Impact on Graduate Students
Table of Contents The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is facing meaningful funding cuts under the proposed 2026 budget, creating uncertainty for graduate students and postdoctoral researchers who rely on federal grants to support their work. These cuts are already impacting lab openings and potentially slowing down research progress across the country. The proposed budget reductions are directly affecting the availability of funding for graduate student research. Many labs are reporting they cannot fully cover the salaries of students even with the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) award, and some are experiencing downsizing. This creates a competitive and stressful environment for students seeking research positions. For example, one first-year graduate student, identified as Sathler, reported labs stating the GRFP fellowship wouldn’t cover their full salary, with some groups also mentioning downsizing plans. This situation highlights the immediate impact of the funding constraints. The NIH funding situation is evolving, with potential for changes based on congressional appropriations. As of January 20, 2026, STAT News reported that a funding deal was being negotiated, but the final outcome remains uncertain. The funding cuts are also making it harder for faculty to recruit first-year students into their labs. A fall seminar course designed to connect first-year students with faculty and their research groups struggled to fill speaking slots, indicating a reluctance among faculty to commit to taking on new students given the financial uncertainties. This suggests a broader trend of labs being more cautious about expanding their research teams. While the current situation is concerning, most first-year students have until the start of their second year to secure a research position. It’s possible that funding concerns could ease by then,depending on the outcome of congressional appropriations processes. The House Appropriations Committee released its draft of the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and related Agencies funding bill on January 11, 2026, outlining proposed funding levels for the NIH. Further updates and the final appropriations decisions will be crucial in determining the long-term impact on graduate student funding.impact on Graduate Research funding
Challenges in Lab Recruitment
Timeline and Potential Relief
