On the 13th, the Democratic Party of Korea urged an investigation into all the doubts surrounding the relocation of the presidential office, saying, “North Korea’s drone invasion of the no-fly zone and the military’s failure to respond are linked to urgently relocate the presidential office.”
The suspect fact-finding team related to the presidential office of the Democratic Party held a press conference in the National Assembly that day and said, “We strongly condemn the ignorant relocation of the presidential office that caused a security vacuum and regulation of drones.” We encourage you to do so. do it immediately,” he said.
The fact-finding team argued that North Korean drones invaded the no-fly zone because the government had significantly reduced the no-fly zone in time for the relocation of the presidential office, despite objections from the Army’s Capital Defense Command. They said, “During the days of the Blue House, the airspace of the no-fly zone was set at a radius of 8.3 km, including Area A with a radius of 3.7 km and Area B with a radius of 4.6 km centered on the Blue House .” It was changed to a radius of 3.7 km, and area B disappeared.” “It appears that North Korea took this opportunity to send an unmanned aerial vehicle across the Blue House to check the posture of the anti-aircraft defense and the unmanned aerial vehicle response system in the vicinity of Seoul and’ r presidential office,” he said.
They criticized, “Despite the recent intensified drone threat due to the development of drone technology, the no-fly zone has been reduced without any countermeasures, as if going backwards in time.” Even with the establishment of a new no-fly zone, it was announced that the area near the presidential office could not be officially designated as a no-fly zone because it proceeded quickly without going through the stages of acceptance, review, discussion and reporting . the measure by the Aerospace Executive Committee.
The fact-finding team said he was also responsible for failing to move the air defense sites and anti-aircraft weapon systems around the Blue House due to the compulsion to relocate the presidency office. They said, “Since there are highlands like Inwangsan and Bukaksan and military units near the Blue House, it was effective in terms of anti-aircraft defense and countermeasures.” We couldn’t move our defense system,” he said.
They said, “Relocating the Oval Office reaps no benefit, causing only a security vacuum, public inconvenience, and blood tax waste.”
> Activate JavaScript to write a comment in LiveRe.
