The Old ACT Suggests New Solution to Nominate “Pita” for Prime Minister Again, Overcoming Article 41

Parliamentary Decision Raises Questions About Constitutionality

Renomination of Prime Minister Sparks Debate Among Legal Experts

In a recent parliamentary decision, the old ACT recommended proposing the renomination of “Pita” for the position of Prime Minister. However, concerns have been raised about the constitutionality of this move. Mr. Amorn Wanichwiwat, a former member of the Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC), has questioned whether Article 41, which states that a motion cannot be repeated, is a regulation that holds the same weight as the rest of the constitution.

According to Section 272 of the Constitution, the Prime Minister is elected by parliament. As someone who was involved in the drafting of the constitution, Amorn Wanichwiwat asserts that there should be no compromise on the constitution. He criticizes those who, without being part of the drafting process, have voiced their opposition to the renomination.

The question of whether Article 41 allows for the proposal of two names to be considered separately is already being discussed. While the parliamentary decision is pending, it remains uncertain if the names put forth will be regarded as a second proposal or a new one. The Speaker of the House of Representatives holds the power to include this proposal in the next meeting scheduled for July 27, although it is considered early by Amorn Wanichwiwat.

It is crucial to understand that the rules of the meeting dictate that if a proposal by the same person fails, a new one cannot be submitted. However, if there is a change in the proposal, such as nominating a different individual alongside Mr. Pita, the Speaker of the National Assembly has the discretion to present it.

While the interpretation of the constitution is not a personal matter, it is essential to recognize that the regulations allow for proposals from new individuals. The number of people who can make nominations depends on the specific meeting. However, if there is an overlapping motion that has already been passed, it cannot be considered.

The old ACT recommends a solution to nominate “Pita” to vote for the Prime Minister again, just by brewing 2 names to make the proposal different. no problem

Mr revealed Amorn Wanichwiwat, former member of the Constitution Drafting Committee or CDC, to the news agency. INN Having reached the parliamentary decision to nominate Mr. Phitha Limcharoenrat Prime Minister for the second time According to the Rules of Parliament, Article 41, a motion cannot be repeated. Does the constitution deteriorate or not that Article 41 is a regulation of parliamentary sessions which the MPs and Senators have considered as the body of the constitution? And in the Constitution, Section 272, there is the election of the prime minister elected in parliament. Being in the CDC, he insisted that nothing would detract from the constitution. As for academics – lawyers who come out to criticize who were not involved in the drafting of this constitution

Therefore, no matter how the decision of the parliamentary meeting comes out Discussion of Article 41 is already underway. and the interpretation that can be repeated quite embarrassing Ready to give an example of that Meetings of the legislative branch There will be a motion for what is to be discussed today, but in this case, there is a debate about whether or not it can be done in the renaming. Therefore, Regulation No. 41 was taken into account if it was a proposal and it had already been passed. it cannot be taken again

However, if the parliamentary session The election of the Prime Minister for the 3rd time, nominates a similar name, such as Mr Phitha and one other candidate, will be considered a second proposal or a new proposal Mr Amorn explained that the appointment for the next meeting on July 27 is too early. But it is possible to propose 2 names and be the power of the Speaker of the House of Representatives. to include this proposal In terms of interpreting the intentions of the constitution, can one person propose only once? Consider re-nomination Many people may still not understand. But in the rules of the meeting clearly defined The proposal alone, the same person, and this proposal has failed. Unable to propose a new one But if there is a change in the proposal I repeat that the Speaker of the National Assembly has the discretion to present a proposal.

At the same time, the offer is not interpreted personally. Not in the offer But if it’s a new person, you can do it. How many people will you offer? It depends on the meeting that can also be done. But if it’s an overlapping motion and it’s already passed, it can’t be done.

#CRC #recommend #nominating #Pitha #vote #Prime #Minister #names #proposal